The top player has 106 wins and ONE loss? The second has 64 wins and 0 losses?
Is this some kind of manipulation or are these two players just that much better than everyone else in the game? 'Cause you'd think that just by sheer chance you couldn't win 100% of your games over that period of time. The third place one is still skewed a bit (4 losses) and everyone after that has a reasonable record for a good player.