Do you enjoy the current meta? - Page 2 — Guild Wars 2 Forums
Home PVP

Do you enjoy the current meta?



  • Fueki.4753Fueki.4753 Member ✭✭✭✭

    too much CC
    too little Stunbreak
    too much stealth, while being too strong
    too much condition application
    sustain is either off the charts or abysmal depending on each build, there is no in between

    but most importantly:
    Warrior needs its damage back on CC skills.

  • memausz.7264memausz.7264 Member ✭✭✭

    Biggest problems:

    Some core specs are completely not viable in in casual fun. Core engi, core warrior, and to some extent core mesmer. Firebrand is rather weak now, too.

    Some specific traits are overpowered on their own, regardless of how good or bad a build is; Ie, Juggernaut trait in Firearms line for Engineer giving infinite stability to a flamethrower wielder.

    Some utility and weapon skills are too strong on their own for their cool down periods - Icerazor's Ire and Darkrazor's Daring are only on 12 sec cooldowns which is more like 10 second cooldowns once you consider Orders from Above's alacrity bonus.

    Some utility options are genuinely too weak to be viable in the vast majority of contexts: for example, Bomb Kit's 240 radius AOEs are too weak for the amount of damage a user should expect via either conditions or direct damage, and the pulsing or single-instance period of the conditions or effects is too low to justify for utility purposes, at least in PvP. Same for elite skills - some skills like "Chilled to the Bone" are now so weak compared to skills like Liche Form in terms of EVERYTHING that there are no remaining applications for the skills; you will always do those weak skill's effects AND then some choosing something else.
    This goes for a lot of CCs at large - there's inconsistency with the "No Dmg for CC" rule in that Swipe and Fear and Lightning Rod can do damage while CC-ing (and then there's Explosive Entrance that activates on hit), but a lot of weapon, utility, and elite skills do no damage anymore really hurting their use cases.

    There are also a lot of tanky builds - despite removing Barbarian, Knight's, and Cavalier's amulets from the game and weakening Paladin's amulet, there are builds that are able to bunk nodes 2v1 in most scenarios, save for +1 by a thief. Bunker durids, condi heralds, condi renegades, condi rangers, burn guards and DHs, hammerbreakers, core necros, decap scrappers, fire weavers, and staff daredevils can all just sit on a node and bunk all game and it's not worth it to move them in most cases without a coordinated effort, sort of impossible to do in ranked. Maybe in ATs, but not in ranked. They might technically be "balanced" on paper but they take away so much fun out of a game because how much they slow it down.

    Then there are builds that are arguably fairly counter able but hard counter some other classes way too strongly, especially in the hands of a good player, to be warranted. Namely condi thieves and dragonhunters running Rune of the Trapper, and also holosmith running grenade kit. They might be "balanced" but it's not fun to fight them in any context. Balance should be built on your ability to outplay your opponent in a 10-15 second time window 1v1 rather than on who snipes their burst first and forces the other player to submit to conditions and control effects.

    Lastly, some builds have access to condition spikes that defeat this supposed philosophy of "damage over time" for conditions - burn guards, condi thieves, condi rangers, scourges, burn weavers, condi revs, and to some extent condi mesmers as well. If it is damage over time, it shouldn't spike 15K damage in 3 seconds.

    Also, the longevity of some conditions at a base are way too long - Ranger traps that put multiple stacks of poison on you for 12+ seconds and Renegade's Sevenshot with it's base torment duration of 7 seconds are just too long. furthermore, No application of immobilization should last longer than 2 seconds, that's too much for decent counterplay.

  • No

    For an entire season I just wish people, including myself as a Thief main, were just unable to queue as Thief. Why? Because it gets really old when so many people in the forums blame every issue on Thief balance/mechanics/stealth.

    Thief existing isn't the reason for the issues in the meta. Balance decisions have lead to the meta being too bunker/sustain heavy, too much random spam happening in teamfights where people go down without getting targeted, condi spam being thrown around like parade candy, and CC being abused to try and interrupt sustain.

    You can't tell me that healbreaker, holo, current state of necros, immob druids, renegades, (fill in blank with meta build), only exist because of "how broken Thief is."

    Honestly....I just wish for a season we thieves couldn't queue at all. Who else is going to decap for you bruisers and bunkers in the teamfights when you're all soooo busy play slapping each other? If anything we're doing you a solid so you can keep chilling with your buddies on the opposing team in your friendship circle. By the time your slow kittens make it to far to decap there'd already be a new drum circle forming and Beck saying his opening lines to introduce a brand new song.

    Have fun with that, ya big ugly tanks. ;) We'll just be playing Among Us in the Order of Whispers cave.

  • buff shatterstone obviously

    Te lazla otstara.
    fingers crossed meta ~

  • Firebeard.1746Firebeard.1746 Member ✭✭✭
    edited November 14, 2020

    This meta is better than previous, but there's still not a lot of diversity and some classes still have way more sustain than they should while others are just fragile. My response is BARELY yes. only because it feels better.

  • noiwk.2760noiwk.2760 Member ✭✭✭

    @Gogdarth.6741 said:
    Support builds are so bad at being supports, a warrior outheals them.
    Cutting down on stab sources/cds on stunbreaks without lowering amount of actual stuns happening.
    Lots of skills that have CC baked into them should also deal damage based on factors of accessibility (cooldown), opportunity cost and cast time/ability to react to.
    Specs being unplayable because PvE mechanical decisions. Or, alternatively, way too good because of them.
    Ridiculous tradeoffs - is it that shocking that Mirage and Chrono "lack sustain" after you cut down a dodge and distortion out of them respectively without compensating for it? Or that nobody plays Berserker because melee class being excessively vulnerable to being counterpressured is bad, therefore having less toughness is terrible?
    300 CD traits still exist.
    No direct communication to let us know what/when to expect anything at all, again.
    Amulet removals mangling already poor balance, because it's either berserker/marauder/marauder-but-toughness(exciting!) or sage/mender, rarely perhaps Carrion. Energy/Cleansing, for having interesting choices is hard.
    A ton of core skills are still terribad in every gamemode ever.

    Overall rating: 10/10, made me play PvE instead for once.

    wow,... i couldnt agree more ! 100% !
    honestly no one could;ve said it better !
    now add bots in .