Resplendent Avialan raptor Feedback - Page 2 — Guild Wars 2 Forums

Resplendent Avialan raptor Feedback

24

Comments

  • kharmin.7683kharmin.7683 Member ✭✭✭✭

    For the love of Pete! Let's not degenerate _this _thread into what is and is not gambling.

    I am a very casual player.
    Very.
    Casual.

  • Come on guys, don't you have any clue how marketing works? They put some single skins that are quite different in the gemstore for 2000 gems because that is expensive. This way not everyone will buy them and the whales buy them to "stand out" (or "stand in town sitting on it"). On the other hand, they can easily now put other skins for around 800-1000 gems in and almost noone will go "this is still too expensive", everyone will go "now this is an acceptable price, unlike 2000 gems".

    The big spenders buy the 2000 gem mounts and feel like they have "something special", while in fact they only have "something expensive"
    The normal people buy the lower priced ones and feel like it is a "good deal" while in fact it is a "perfectly normal" price :)

    YouTube “L2villagejester”.
    People using belittling wording like whining/qqing" are not taken seriously by me
    Same for people posting only to tell others not to post (“deal with it”-posts)

  • Weindrasi.3805Weindrasi.3805 Member ✭✭✭
    edited November 28, 2017

    As nice looking as it is, I won't pay 2,000 gems for it. I was fine with the RNG skins because they were cheap and you are bound to get something new no matter what. I'm not interested in putting down 2,000 gems for one mount, though. The excitement of having the fancy mount would wear off in under a week, and then I'd still be out 20-30 dollars. So, nah.

  • Leo G.4501Leo G.4501 Member ✭✭✭✭

    Just logged in and saw this in the gem store. My thoughts:

    Very interesting. Looking it over, I do like the avian theme for the raptor and hope they add more skins like it. It was one of my personal expectations for raptor mount skins, and there is many more possibilities to explore here! Please add more of them!

    HOWEVER...I do not like the peacock tail feathers. It's not that I don't like them, it's that they replace the tail and it looks like a buttcape but for my mount and I despise buttcapses. I cannot see the raptor's legs while it's running (honest, I don't have a leg fetish, but I do like to see the form of my characters' bodies including the mounts). This would have to be priced particularly low for me to purchase this (like 800 gems). I feel these unique mount skins are more worth 1400-1500 gems, rather pricey for some but if they wait patiently for a sale in the future (25% off would put it in the 1.1k gems range) would definitely fly off the shelf. I myself still wouldn't buy it (same with the jackal skin, did not like that one at all, personally) but I could definitely see myself caving for a sale on this raptor skin. At 2k gems, there's no way I'd ever bother.

    Now if there were a raptor skin with the same avian motif and a lizard tail with some feathers arranged to resemble a feathered dinosaur and it was priced at 2k gems, I would really have to think if I'd try to purchase or hope for a sale in the future.

  • I haven't even looked it at, I don't need to, I won't be spending 2000 gems on a single skin no matter what it looks like. not now, not ever. as soon as I read that it was there in the patch notes I literally laughed

    70 'mains' and waiting for more slots
    | 61 Asura | 6 Charr | 1 Norn | 1 Human | 1 Sylvari |

  • Erasculio.2914Erasculio.2914 Member ✭✭✭✭

    Yeah, 2000 gems is way too much. Ignoring how the store sells only a 2400 package, so we would have to buy more than the two thousand if starting at zero gems, buying a single skin for the price of the full Path of Fire expansion is kind of ridiculous.

    For something that completely changed how the mount looks like (if there was a skin for the griffon to look like this, for example), I could see something at 1500 gems. This one, though... It's not just a reskin - it changes the model a bit - but IMO it's not a rework of the mount and as such it's not worth this high of price.

    "Tomorrow my master chokes on his own whip!" - Lore of Skaen, PoE

  • Leo G.4501Leo G.4501 Member ✭✭✭✭

    @Witch of Doom.5739 said:
    We 'whiners' who complained about the RNG adoption licenses have nothing to do with this latest release of one 2000 gem skin. It was planned and created long before we complained about those. ANet will have to look at its sales figures to see if the 2000 gem skins sell enough to make them worthwhile. I hope for a Wintersday pack like the Spooky Day pack of 5 skins for 1600 gems.

    I bet, for Winter's Day, they will release the much requested Toy Griffon mount for 2000 gems. I bet people would complain but a lot would still buy.

  • Anet, you had so much goodwill from the community. Why are you flushing it down the toilet? Anyhow, add my voice to those saying "no way". 2000 gems is far too expensive for one skin. 800 would have been fine. At 800 a pop, I'd buy numerous skins. But at 2000 or a lootbox, I won't buy a single one.

  • Not my cup of tea but i think the price is fine, it's not a simple re-skin has new animations and probably took a fair amount of work.
    I hope Anet continues to make these new mounts and are successful in selling them (horse please?)
    If 2000 gems is what they figured out to cover the artists time in making this then that's fair enough

  • Krypto.2069Krypto.2069 Member ✭✭✭

    @Ashen.2907 said:
    "Its not worth 2000 gems," to you.

    So dont buy it.

    Not a difficult concept. If a luxury item is priced above one's price limit one does not buy it.

    Ashen, I think you hit the NAIL on the HEAD (and I couldn't agree more)...

    These 2000 gem skins are certainly LUXURY ITEMS. (All the skins are really.) And if a luxury item is not worth the asking price for a particular person, then don't buy it.... simple. :+1:

    Now this Peacock and the Fire Hound 2k gems mount skins... although very stylish and gorgeous, are not worth 2K gems to me. :wink:

    However, WHEN Anet gets around to releasing a DRAGON skin for the griffon and it's kick-booty-looking, I'll gladly fork over 2K gems for it!! :smiley: (And knowing me, I'd probably buy 800 gems with USD and convert in-game gold to gems for the remaining 1200 gems needed.)

    Btw...all you people that object to the whole 2k gem price for these luxury GW2 mount skins, do you actually play the game and make gold or do you just stand around in LA and talk? :lol:
    Seriously, if you're playing the game, especially PvE, you should have some gold to convert to gems to reduce the need to spend real life money for at least a portion of the mount skin cost, right?

    (Head's up... start saving your in-game gold now to convert into gems, because unless Anet's Marketing people are totally clueless - there WILL BE a Dragon skin released at some point. And if you save now, you might just have enough in-game gold to buy it outright! I know that's my plan. :+1:)

    Moonlight [THRU]

  • @Oglaf.1074 said:

    @DarcShriek.5829 said:

    @Oglaf.1074 said:

    @DarcShriek.5829 said:

    @Oglaf.1074 said:

    @Bloodstealer.5978 said:
    you had the opportunity to buy skins over a period of time for 400 gems each

    No that is blatantly false.

    We had the opportunity to gamble for skins at 400 Gems per "spin".

    Nice trying to blame the players for Anet's terrible business practices as of late though. Super class act, man. This insane pricing is in no way or form the "fault" of the playerbase.

    The mount adoption license is not gambling. Gambling implies that something of value could be won. Nothing of value could be won with the mount adoption. Nothing recieved was worth even 1 penny.

    Hahaha, no. It is gambling in every sense of the word. Technically and legally it isn't gambling (because the law is slow to catch up) but... yeah, we all know it is gambling.

    The fact that you're getting a crappy "Win every time!"-consolation price doesn't make it any less so. It is like those carneval games where they have all the big and impressive stuffed toys all over their stand, only for your "Win every time!" prize is a little keychain.

    Technically and legally are the only definitions that count. Your opinion doesn't.
    Just a correction here, your not getting a consolation prize. Your not getting anything. It's not gambling. The odds of you receiving anything of value are exactly 0.

    How are you NOT getting a consolation price? You're getting the keychain (cheap, simple retextures) rather than the big fancy stuffed toy (the skins with a new model and/or sfx). It works EXACTLY like one of those "Win a prize every time!"-stalls.

    My analogy was precisely on point here, if I may toot my own trumpet.

    No your analogy was totally off point. Read what I am saying. NO ONE WINS A PRIZE. NONE OF THESE SKINS HAVE ANY REAL VALUE.

  • Endless Soul.5178Endless Soul.5178 Member ✭✭✭✭

    @Ashen.2907 said:
    "Its not worth 2000 gems," to you.

    So dont buy it.

    Not a difficult concept. If a luxury item is priced above one's price limit one does not buy it.

    Although I can easily afford it without even blinking, this is exactly what I'm doing, not buying it.

    No mount skin is worth $25.00 to me.

    Asura characters: Zerina | Myndee | Bekka | Akee | Feyyt | Nuumy | Tylee | Rissa | Jaxxi | Sixx | Claara | Conii | Jymm | Synn | Zeena

    Your skin will wrinkle and your youth will fade but your soul is endless

  • costepj.5120costepj.5120 Member ✭✭✭

    That sure is one ugly skin. I wouldn't use it if it was a freebie.

    So long and thanks for all the Skritt

  • sorudo.9054sorudo.9054 Member ✭✭✭✭

    @DarcShriek.5829 said:

    @Oglaf.1074 said:

    @DarcShriek.5829 said:

    @Oglaf.1074 said:

    @DarcShriek.5829 said:

    @Oglaf.1074 said:

    @Bloodstealer.5978 said:
    you had the opportunity to buy skins over a period of time for 400 gems each

    No that is blatantly false.

    We had the opportunity to gamble for skins at 400 Gems per "spin".

    Nice trying to blame the players for Anet's terrible business practices as of late though. Super class act, man. This insane pricing is in no way or form the "fault" of the playerbase.

    The mount adoption license is not gambling. Gambling implies that something of value could be won. Nothing of value could be won with the mount adoption. Nothing recieved was worth even 1 penny.

    Hahaha, no. It is gambling in every sense of the word. Technically and legally it isn't gambling (because the law is slow to catch up) but... yeah, we all know it is gambling.

    The fact that you're getting a crappy "Win every time!"-consolation price doesn't make it any less so. It is like those carneval games where they have all the big and impressive stuffed toys all over their stand, only for your "Win every time!" prize is a little keychain.

    Technically and legally are the only definitions that count. Your opinion doesn't.
    Just a correction here, your not getting a consolation prize. Your not getting anything. It's not gambling. The odds of you receiving anything of value are exactly 0.

    How are you NOT getting a consolation price? You're getting the keychain (cheap, simple retextures) rather than the big fancy stuffed toy (the skins with a new model and/or sfx). It works EXACTLY like one of those "Win a prize every time!"-stalls.

    My analogy was precisely on point here, if I may toot my own trumpet.

    No your analogy was totally off point. Read what I am saying. NO ONE WINS A PRIZE. NONE OF THESE SKINS HAVE ANY REAL VALUE.

    well, if we go with how much it costs, it has a value but it is digital.
    apparently normal skins are 400 gems which is about 5 euro, regardless on how you look at it the value is and remains 5 euro.

    with that in mind, let's keep one thing out of this, it is NOT a gamble but a guaranteed drop with all of them within the same value.
    a gamble is when you can win but also lose, the contract guarantees a mount skin you don't own yet so you never lose.
    better yet, you could better call it a lottery with every ticked a guaranteed price regardless.

  • 2000? No.
    I would offer... 800 gems for this skin. Not a gem more.

    In all my time playing since the big mount skin release, I have seen countless adoptable mounts, but never a single Reforged Warhound jackal. I'm beginning to forget what it's even supposed to look like. It seems clear to me that no one is buying these expensive skins. ANet could increase their profits buy cutting prices here, I'm sure of it.

  • Ohoni.6057Ohoni.6057 Member ✭✭✭✭

    I'll be honest, I think this skin might be worth 2000 gems. I mean, that's still preposterously high, yes. $25 for a single mount skin? I'd never pay that myself, but if people do, ok, fine. This has a lot of fancy stuff going on, and I can't say that it would never be worth $25 human dollars if people are willing to pay that. That said, they do need to have a LOT of other skins that are NOT 2000 gems, and so far they've failed on that count. They need to stop putting out 2000 gem skins until they have plenty of 200-800 gem mount skins on the marketplace. They already have 30 skins sitting unused in a gamble box, they can just drop those onto the store at a moment's notice. Make it happen, ANet.

  • @Oglaf.1074 said:

    @Bloodstealer.5978 said:
    you had the opportunity to buy skins over a period of time for 400 gems each

    No that is blatantly false.

    We had the opportunity to gamble for skins at 400 Gems per "spin".

    So I assume you are in favor of outlawing those bubble-gum machines they have outside supermarkets, because you might not get your favorite flavor?

    I look forward to seeing this mount in the game. I won't be buying it because sitting on a giant peacock is not half as cool as being parked on a dinosaur. 2000 is a cringe-worthy price, but if you made a skin that I completely fell in love with, i would probably find the money, and would possibly enjoy it all the more knowing it would not be seen everywhere I go, like that Geomancer glider skin when it was released.

    Whether luxury-priced skins are going to be profitable in the long run is something you will have to wait and see about.

  • Leo G.4501Leo G.4501 Member ✭✭✭✭

    @Fade.5904 said:
    Not my cup of tea but i think the price is fine, it's not a simple re-skin has new animations and probably took a fair amount of work.
    I hope Anet continues to make these new mounts and are successful in selling them (horse please?)
    If 2000 gems is what they figured out to cover the artists time in making this then that's fair enough

    I'm in agreement here as well as the poster that mentioned these skins may be aimed at whales.

    To me, I think it should be perfectly reasonable to look at these skins and desiring them but not wanting to spend the gold/gems/cash for them or if you REALLY want to get the skin because you adore it, you can farm/save for it. Whales will just buy them all while normies will not buy them or only buy a very specific skin.

    Again, to me, how is it any different from a player who has the skill/time to farm up legendary backpieces and those backpieces being out of reach for someone who cannot invest that type of time/effort to get the same prestige skin?

  • DarcShriek.5829DarcShriek.5829 Member ✭✭✭
    edited November 28, 2017

    @costepj.5120 said:
    That sure is one ugly skin. I wouldn't use it if it was a freebie.

    I think the raptor looks bad kitten. The peacock not so much.
    I might use it as a freebie. But like you I can't picture buying it at any price. I hope they sell a lot of them.

  • Seriously Anet? 2,000 gem?! Who are you kidding? If a skin costs more then a game, its too much money. This skin is worth 800 gems at most. Yes. 800 gems. Who decided one skin needs to cost almost as much as a full game? Can we not just get a bunch of 400-800 gem skins that aren't random? I would like to buy some skins for my mounts. But PLEASE. No random nonsense, no 800+ gem cost skins.

    This whole thing feels like Anet said "You don't want cheap random skins? Fine. 2,000 gems is all you get now. But hey! It is not random just like you guys wanted."

  • Anet,

    Please help me understand why mount skins are 2k gems when similar items like outfits are 700 gems. It feels like you are telling us to kitten it :(

  • Ardid.7203Ardid.7203 Member ✭✭✭✭

    Beautiful, beautiful skin. I would pay 1000 gems for it, maybe even 1200!

  • Ashen.2907Ashen.2907 Member ✭✭✭✭

    @Endless Soul.5178 said:

    @Ashen.2907 said:
    "Its not worth 2000 gems," to you.

    So dont buy it.

    Not a difficult concept. If a luxury item is priced above one's price limit one does not buy it.

    Although I can easily afford it without even blinking, this is exactly what I'm doing, not buying it.

    No mount skin is worth $25.00 to me.

    Although I, also, could easily buy it with either real money or gold, it would take something really special for me to be willing to spend 2000 gems on a mount. Based on past experience of ANet's current taste in skins, its not likely to happen.

  • Adenin.5973Adenin.5973 Member ✭✭✭

    Lol, I told ppl in the "rng thread" that the problem would not be the rng but the pricing. I told them that Anet absolutely has no problem selling us 2k mounts and bundles. I told them ppl are not upset because of rng, because what they really want is a certain mount for 800 gems instantly.

    Well, here we are... We have no more rng and guess what ppl are as unhappy as ever.

  • Unpopular opinion here, but I am very pleased with this mount skin. I too would agree 2000 gems is a bit expensive even considering I don't shy from spending irl money in video games by any means, but I saw it, thought it was super cute and pretty so I bought it. The previous Reforged Warhound I found to be terribly ugly and I could never see myself spend $25 dollars on anything of the like. The Resplendent Avialan raptor though was too lovely for me to pass up. I don't see myself making a habit out of buying mount skins at this price mind you. I'll give my kudos for this pretty bird (whom I've named Lambert) nontheless. :3

    [KEK] | WvW Junkie | Screenshot Enthusiast

  • Erasculio.2914Erasculio.2914 Member ✭✭✭✭

    @MissMajor.8290 said:
    Unpopular opinion here, but I am very pleased with this mount skin. I too would agree 2000 gems is a bit expensive

    I don't think your opinion is unpopular or even the minority. I think many people here are saying the skin by itself is not ugly, just too expensive - which is pretty much what you are saying too.

    "Tomorrow my master chokes on his own whip!" - Lore of Skaen, PoE

  • Ashen.2907Ashen.2907 Member ✭✭✭✭

    @LieutenantDan.5216 said:
    Anet,

    Please help me understand why mount skins are 2k gems when similar items like outfits are 700 gems. It feels like you are telling us to kitten it :(

    Because it seems unlikely, to me at least, that sales of the expac at its reduced price point were sufficient to cover costs, and so mount skins are expected to carry a greater portion of the needed revenue for development (including development of mounts).

    People asked for mounts, gave mount skin gemstore sales as justification for the addition, and even pointed out that mounts are some of the most expensive cash shop items in the industry...and now we have mounts as some of the most expensive items in our cash shop.

  • @Oglaf.1074 said:
    Aye, I'm not angry.

    I'm just very, very disappointed.

    Anet used to be the developer/company I used as the go-to example of freemium done right.

    Is it before or after , when you where hopping from thread to thread , to boycot the price of HoT , because you woulddnt buy a 60 dollars dlc ?

  • Zedek.8932Zedek.8932 Member ✭✭✭
    edited November 28, 2017

    Just replace your thread with everything "premium" and there you go:

    The (INSERT ITEM) is not worth (AMOUNT)!! They are great but...

    Some examples:
    The iPhone X is not worth €1,100!! It's great, but...
    That Lamborghini is not worth €400,000! It's great, but...
    That High end PC is not worth €2,000! It's great, but...

    If it kindles a feel of need and happyness while using it, it's fine.
    The problem is that often threads like this create hate towards people using own owning these.
    "Oh, look, that whale. He gotta be a smug"...

    I have the big need of just wearing real leather clothes. And people come up and yell "WHAT? €400 for a leather coat. It's nice but you could've bought a PU "Leather" one for €30". Yeeeaah, no. Buy it or not.

    Excelsior, my name is Zedexx; Asuran Deadeye and assassin.
    The Hunter / 2x Darksteel Pistols / 2x Whisper's Secret Daggers and my Springer. That's all I need and trust.
    "We [Asura] are the concentrated magnificence!"

  • I think the raptor skin is very nice, all kinds of flashy, but 2000 gems is more than I am willing to pay right now. Good work though.

  • Leo G.4501Leo G.4501 Member ✭✭✭✭

    @Zedek.8932 said:
    Just replace your thread with everything "premium" and there you go:

    The (INSERT ITEM) is not worth (AMOUNT)!! They are great but...

    Some examples:
    The iPhone X is not worth €1,100!! It's great, but...
    That Lamborghini is not worth €400,000! It's great, but...
    That High end PC is not worth €2,000! It's great, but...

    If it kindles a feel of need and happyness while using it, it's fine.
    The problem is that often threads like this create hate towards people using own owning these.
    "Oh, look, that whale. He gotta be a smug"...

    I have the big need of just wearing real leather clothes. And people come up and yell "WHAT? €400 for a leather coat. It's nice but you could've bought a PU "Leather" one for €30". Yeeeaah, no. Buy it or not.

    They gotta have that equality of outcomes, my guy.

  • @Ohoni.6057 said:

    @Adenin.5973 said:
    Lol, I told ppl in the "rng thread" that the problem would not be the rng but the pricing. I told them that Anet absolutely has no problem selling us 2k mounts and bundles. I told them ppl are not upset because of rng, because what they really want is a certain mount for 800 gems instantly.

    Well, here we are... We have no more rng and guess what ppl are as unhappy as ever.

    It can be both.

    It IS both.

    The problem is BOTH RNG and high cost.

    They have to fix both things.

    High cost is opinion. I make $20 in 25 minutes at work.

  • Ashen.2907Ashen.2907 Member ✭✭✭✭

    @Donari.5237 said:

    @Leo G.4501 said:
    To me, I think it should be perfectly reasonable to look at these skins and desiring them but not wanting to spend the gold/gems/cash for them or if you REALLY want to get the skin because you adore it, you can farm/save for it. Whales will just buy them all while normies will not buy them or only buy a very specific skin.

    Again, to me, how is it any different from a player who has the skill/time to farm up legendary backpieces and those backpieces being out of reach for someone who cannot invest that type of time/effort to get the same prestige skin?

    The difference is that you can work very slowly towards the legendary items. This skin is "limited time only" and if that is the same time frame as the Reforged Warhound then people who don't have the resources this week can't get it. (Maybe next week. Could last two weeks. Won't be here a solid year, though).

    If I still had the disposable income I did before I retired, I'd probably buy these bigger ticket items. As it is, I passed on the Warhound and much as I like peacocks, I'm probably passing on this one too. The tail blocking the view is a problem for me, for one thing. Mostly, though, once something is over 800 gems (ie 10 bucks, which is still in my whim range) I give myself enough time to think about it to determine that I will be really deeply unhappy to have missed it. And once I have that amount of thinking, I realize that almost no gem skins will really bother me not to have, given the wide variety I've already collected.

    Sorry, ANet. It's a pretty nifty skin once dyed, and I'm sure it has interesting animations though Dulfy's video didn't seem to showcase those, but you priced it too high.

    You could work toward this item gradually over time as well. Building up a reserve of resources for that inevitable moment of, "I really like that!" is the best approach to getting anything in game IMO.

  • Ohoni.6057Ohoni.6057 Member ✭✭✭✭

    @DarcShriek.5829 said:

    @Ohoni.6057 said:

    @Adenin.5973 said:
    Lol, I told ppl in the "rng thread" that the problem would not be the rng but the pricing. I told them that Anet absolutely has no problem selling us 2k mounts and bundles. I told them ppl are not upset because of rng, because what they really want is a certain mount for 800 gems instantly.

    Well, here we are... We have no more rng and guess what ppl are as unhappy as ever.

    It can be both.

    It IS both.

    The problem is BOTH RNG and high cost.

    They have to fix both things.

    High cost is opinion. I make $20 in 25 minutes at work.

    Good for you. There are other players who do not.

  • Danikat.8537Danikat.8537 Member ✭✭✭✭

    Seeing the raptor in-game (when I finally found some, they're like buses, none for ages then 3 in LA all together) has actually made me more tempted to get it.

    But I'm still not sure I can justify spending so much on it. No it's not a lot in the grand scheme of things, but there's a lot of other things I want to buy with both my real money and my gold. (Weekend tickets to a music festival, plus 3 other concerts 2 of which are abroad, plus Christmas gifts for about 30 people and a Nintendo Switch amongst other things with the cash and the rest of the griffon collection, a commander tag and a lot of mini pets with the gold.) If it was sticking around I'd probably calculate how much cash I can spend on it, save up gold for the remainder and buy it. But I doubt I'll have time to do that.

    Danielle Aurorel - Desolation EU. Mini Collector.

    "In this town, we call home, everyone hail to the pumpkin song! In this town, don't we love it now? Everyone's waiting for the next surprise!"

  • Curunen.8729Curunen.8729 Member ✭✭✭✭

    Don't buy it, same as don't buy the rng mount license.

    I really like the Stardust Jackal skin for example, but as others have said I don't want to waste gems contributing to Anet seeing as few successful sales as possible.

    Ideally these things should be no more than 800 gems each - from a customer point of view (I have no idea the workload and time required to create a new mount skin so can't measure the cost up that way).

    My ears, how are you! | Kourna Jackrabbit for default Springer

  • Erasculio.2914Erasculio.2914 Member ✭✭✭✭

    @Ohoni.6057 said:
    Good for you. There are other players who do not.

    IMO, that's not even the point. If you were to ask Bill Gates if he would buy a common bread for 1.000 USD per unit he would say no, because that's too expensive, despite how he makes far more money than anyone in this forum. How much someone earns per month doesn't change how valuable something is; we don't define price based on a percentage of our income.

    I think ArenaNet knows the 2000 gems mount skins are too expensive from the point of view of a lot of people, but I also think they don't need a lot of people to buy those - a few would be enough to give them a profit. Complaining about them is thus better than just "voting with our wallet".

    "Tomorrow my master chokes on his own whip!" - Lore of Skaen, PoE

  • @Kate Soulguard.7132 said:

    The price is insane. I'm not spending another dime of real money in the gemstore.

    Respectfully, if we spend our gems on lower-priced items, that will show ANet what we're interested in. I buy discounted items a lot, bought the Spooky Day mounts pack (5 skins for 1600 gems), for example.

  • At first i laughed at the looks of it and then at the price.
    Good thing default skins are great.

  • Figlilly.3907Figlilly.3907 Member ✭✭
    edited November 29, 2017

    Well, a peacock poppinjay bravely born would not turn up his noble nose in scorn.

    Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.

©2010–2018 ArenaNet, LLC. All rights reserved. Guild Wars, Guild Wars 2, Heart of Thorns, Guild Wars 2: Path of Fire, ArenaNet, NCSOFT, the Interlocking NC Logo, and all associated logos and designs are trademarks or registered trademarks of NCSOFT Corporation. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.