Balsa.3951 Posted March 23, 2019 Share Posted March 23, 2019 Anet may consider a more simple map for beginners2 points only and make the points to hold more obvious and shiny. This can be a unranked only map. No special objectives in it only 2 caps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sephiroth.4217 Posted March 23, 2019 Share Posted March 23, 2019 and it should be 2v2 or 3v3 lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stand The Wall.6987 Posted March 23, 2019 Share Posted March 23, 2019 heck even 1 point and make it a king of the hill type mode. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abazigal.3679 Posted March 23, 2019 Share Posted March 23, 2019 To be honest this isn't so complicated with 3 points, it's just too easy builds that made players rely more on builds than on map awareness.I rarely do see maths being done ( i.e when score is 490-490 2 caps to 1), people running in circle on point to delay, timekillings, etc.. Although it's not so hard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swagg.9236 Posted March 24, 2019 Share Posted March 24, 2019 You are very misguided if you think that simply reducing the number of points and side-objectives to a map would make GW2 "easier" or "more intuitive" than any current map or gamemode currently present in the game. The reason why GW2 PvP is such a mess to watch or learn is because it revolves around esoteric hard-counters and instantaneous effects which are either triggered simultaneously or passively without player input. Players explode without any real warning as an opponent magically appears next to the body from 1200+ range away. That's the sort of thing that you would want to address if you were looking to facilitate an education on how to play GW2 PvP (although, considering how passive and un-engaging it often is, I'm not sure why you would do so). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.