Relinks during event week

[L A T I O N.8923]

How you Guys feel about An event week during relinks?

I have a bit mixed feelings about it, last couple weeks of relinks feel either more dead or Alive based on how experienced the link itself

Should an event week, which attract players should be in the first week of the links? I feel it is in a better place when it's somewere halfway the links OR near the end

[Gop.8713]

Not only do I not care, but I don't care so much that I voted for not caring and made a post about it . . .

[dragontree.8092]

I would prefer to vote for an option not there, a week or more after relinks. i'd prefer to know what server/guilds/players i am linked with, to have a better idea of how a fight might go so i can make a suitable build, although, already knowing what my server runs and skill, i don't think it would make that large of a difference in the long run, but for others it may.

[displayname.8315]

Pick the right link to transfer to guys or you won't get to play for the next few weeks. Good luck!!

[HazyDaisy.4107]

I'd worry more about what the first week does for the second week and beyond. Because once the wxp hunting pop spike is gone the rest of us have to deal with the consequences.

As far as per link shift panic, history has told me that we'll either get paired with a certain server or we won't so I'm not worried about that either.

[Some Call Me Tim.2319]

Relinks really are a total waste of time. People just bandwagon to a linked server anyway. There are a bunch all ready to do just that shortly after relinks that are coming up so they do nothing useful anyway.

[Gop.8713]

@"Balthazzarr.1349" said:Relinks really are a total waste of time. People just bandwagon to a linked server anyway. There are a bunch all ready to do just that shortly after relinks that are coming up so they do nothing useful anyway.

It actually seems to make bandwagoning worse since it provides a cheaper way to stack onto a host server . . .

I'm biased bc I like low-pop play but I would rather see them leave most if not all of the current host servers without a link and just link all of us tiny little servers together vs one another in t4 . . .

[Optimator.3589]

I give no kittens. Not even one adorable little kitten.

[RisingDaewn.8703]

It's going to be hectic either way, because of double wxp.You could be linked to a host, who is full or close to it and have a decent population on the link server, so some people might be forced to transfer somewhere else.

[HazyDaisy.4107]

@Gop.8713 said:

@"Balthazzarr.1349" said:Relinks really are a total waste of time. People just bandwagon to a linked server anyway. There are a bunch all ready to do just that shortly after relinks that are coming up so they do nothing useful anyway.

It actually seems to make bandwagoning worse since it provides a cheaper way to stack onto a host server . . .

I'm biased bc I like low-pop play but I would rather see them leave most if not all of the current host servers without a link and just link all of us tiny little servers together vs one another in t4 . . .

I could get behind that idea in fact I've suggested that before. But you know how they say there's no one on guests servers....turns out there's too many if you lumped us all together and not enough for a T5.