Jump to content
  • Sign Up

camboyano.9675

Members
  • Posts

    14
  • Joined

  • Last visited

camboyano.9675's Achievements

  1. They spend less and less effort. Every time they need "more time" for less quality
  2. Directx 12 Checkpoints in story missions (error 7:13 is frustrating in long missions)
  3. The writers wanted to turn smodur into a monster, but he is actually the only one who behaves like a general. The char are a race that lives for war and combat, the idea of a civil war is good but I dont think that it´s well executed. Returning to Smodur, he is the only one who seems to win the war.
  4. Yes, is better have 1 only mode to fun no? or maybe because of that pvp is so death
  5. I do not know if it is that the writers do not have time to work on the narrative or find it difficult to do it in this medium, Or perhaps they need to create a story with certain parameters established and do what they can with the bad decisions already made. But they always fail with the logic of the characters that use or feel forced. The charr have lived for centuries in permanent war, having a society formed for that state. And they tell us this civil war will be the end of the char? Really?
  6. Yes. Conquest is the same after 8 years whit a few maps new (8 years!!!!!) 3 vs 3 and conquest and stronghold (i dont have any problem whit this mode) can live in the same time. More option create a better experiencie a less option boring and quit people
  7. I like 3vs3 & 2v2 much more than conquering mode. make this mode permanent whit conquest and all happy
  8. If they can fix this problem i dont understand why dont put checkpoint in the instance, whit that we dont need restart ALL INSTANCE. i replay story whit my other characters and i hate so much when this error happendes in a large instance....
  9. Nice. But why you dont add 2vs2 and 3vs3 or XvX (if in the future we have 10 vs 10) permanently in unranker? (or ranked to change a little to only play conquest)
  10. Well i dont think we kill any of the warband yet. In my opinion in this chapter or next Ryland kill Bagnar. Or he conspiracy with us to us kill him and can take the control of the new "faction". Why i think that? because in the episode 2.5 Ryland say ""Bangar likes to take risks, if I play my cards well ..." and i dont imagine Ryland as double agent.
  11. Yes, and now we win in this civil war and after that he travel in the time to other tyria. And the next expansion is not in Cantha is in the a new timeline....
  12. The problem is not the characters (which some may be more cliche or annoying) the problem is the poor writing that the writers of Anet have. Let's remove braham and taimi and we would have other characters doing something similar but even worse (since they would be new and there would be less background) I think is because writers use her as a deux ex machina
  13. I like the post. I will give my opinion: pvp: i really have hope in this new mode 15 vs 15 buy yes ... pvp needs more content. and it's not that there are no ideas they could make maps set in the hots and pof expansions. new modalities and so more ... PvE: Taking out that raids are "hard" high end content and that fractals are made for the one who likes to farm fast without seriously compromising. world pve: I hope in the next expansion to make more use of instantiated content. why? Since holding events on balls of 20 - 40 people is not fun, it´s not challenging. It´s just running and spamming an attack and the autoloot. On the other hand, content that uses a quota of players allows for a better leveling of the difficulty (the game has a great base combat system, that's an advantage, the problem is that they create content against that system)
×
×
  • Create New...