Malitias.8453

OP: "Multiboxing should be agains the ToS" (which strongly implies it currently isn't) Rando: "But Multiboxing is allowed by ANet! Here's proof!"

Wait a few months, then try again. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Hello_Day Edit: But also, hi.

And my point, or the one I was trying to make, is that there are plenty of games that do just fine without even including RNG-based loot in the first place. It might be a stretch, but I have the suspicion that the trend of making most rewards, even the important ones, RNG-based kind of paved the way for the rise of those scummy tactics. Again, might be a stretch, but it seems plausible to me.

See my post at the top of this page.

No, they don't. They absolutely don't.

It would be so awesome if you could do this for each ability individually as well..

What the... you haven't played many games obviously. There's always the question of how much of the rewards are RNG based and if the majority of important items can be acquired with certainty. Games like Dark Souls, Sekiro, Outward(apart from the last DLC, screw that DLC) have close to no meaningful items or mechanics tied to RNG. The importance of the rewards that are tied to RNG is what can make it frustrating. Random rewards also used to be the absolute exception in competitive genres like strategy and fighting games. And I can't remember anything that involved RNG back when I played Donkey Kong and Super Mario on the SNES. Adventure Games like Monkey Island have no RNG whatsoever.

lol

I'll just leave this here in case people haven't seen it yet (it says mobile, but it's become a lot more common on other platforms as well)

I don't know if ANet does this, but a friend of mine who is very susceptible to gambling and wasted too much money on PoEs mystery boxes, contacted the support to disable his accounts possibility of buying them and they did that. It's worth giving that a try, I think.

Well, technically this wording would mean you are not allowed to quote this (and neither am I) because we are publicly discussing moderation now. 😜 Good thing our law doesn't work like that Edit: Just found this: https://www.guildwars2.com/en/legal/the-forums-code-of-conduct/ Discussing / Debating Moderator or GM Actions -challenge the removal of a thread or post; instead e-mail Forums@Arena.Net with questions -debate the closure of a thread -petition on behalf of a forum member whose forum or game account has been suspended or terminated

I absolutely agree. I was just curious and looked into why the forced name change might have occured and tried to answer OPs question.

I'm not sure, but maybe sexuality is not supposed to be part of a character name, same as something like "lesbian charr" or "gay charr". naming policy This states they do not permit names that reference sexual acts. One could argue that the sexuality also references to the sexual act and is thefore not permitted.

How does this thread conflict with ToS/forum rules?

I've had similar situations and feel like the trading post in general is very "oops-prone", especially when it's lagging and you're not sure if you really clicked a button. You have to be very patient with it.