Jump to content
  • Sign Up

Lya Babies.9632

Members
  • Content Count

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Lya Babies.9632

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. looks like I was wrong it's not from the massivelyop article but from a leaked press kit that the MOP article directly quotes from https://www.dropbox.com/sh/vfz8nbokjkyq5ro/AADTzUrT480cU2aagG22OKjAa?dl=0&preview=Elite+Specialization+Beta+2+press+brief.pdf I guess we should take it with a grain of salt
  2. it looks like bladesworn loses weapon swap 😕 As the gunsaber is considered their primary weapon, bladesworn lose access to the ability to equip and switch between two separate weapon sets while in combat. from the massivelyOP article
  3. oh I don’t walk back on the tanking point. I’ve seen it. I was actually on that server for a while and experienced it first hand. The other issues, however, are actually more of a problem. You were on that server for a while, so why are you talking about it now? 2016 Mag wasn't 2017 Mag nor is it 2020 Mag. You have no idea how Mag works now but as I said earlier you are holding onto this tired narrative that they are the same as they were in the past.
  4. No we’re not, but other servers are. Well, this is nothing new since 2012. It is scoring- and population mechanics that are anathematic to the ladder we play on. It could be as simple as Balthazzar points out with other servers tanking around you to inflate your position on the ladder and you didn't see it in time to adapt. It could also be something more benign but easily as problematic. Something as small as a 10-man night crew that has no opposition in your "actual" tier inflating you up to a tier where they finally get some opposition, only then, your prime-time is out-populated 2:1 and
  5. This is the current tick. In addition, green is 3x our score in the current skirmish. https://imgur.com/a/UuIUr94 almost 4 hours later red logs on to continue the flipping of ebg territory that green had done earlier. you can see in the bottom right of the image there's that illustrious outnumbered buff that all these other servers claim to have during NA prime. I guess the only real difference between mag and the other two is they don't spend their time whining about the circumstances and looking for others to commiserate in their 'permanently farmed' status with. oh, and I guess that they p
  6. You specifically said that you'll "never understand the need to play this way" in reference to your conspiratorial belief that mag is purposefully tanking. so you walking back your points doesn't work. to your second point, no one is bandwaggoning to mag of all servers. Most fight guilds and relevant players (players that aren't just empty bags for the enemy server) know that mag is horrible at ppt and generally want to fight t1/t2 which requires ppt. The fight guilds on DR have been on DR since their last link with BG and I'm pretty sure whichever server they were linked to before that. To my
  7. No we’re not, but other servers are. Well, this is nothing new since 2012. It is scoring- and population mechanics that are anathematic to the ladder we play on. It could be as simple as Balthazzar points out with other servers tanking around you to inflate your position on the ladder and you didn't see it in time to adapt. It could also be something more benign but easily as problematic. Something as small as a 10-man night crew that has no opposition in your "actual" tier inflating you up to a tier where they finally get some opposition, only then, your prime-time is out-populated 2:1 and
  8. right? Mag doesn't complain when the two other servers ktrain our bl and ebg keep back and forth with one another during ocx/sea/eu hours, leaving us ticking sometimes as low as 20, but suddenly it's a problem when these other servers can't rally up and take back their ebg territory during NA PRIME on NA servers. Even while we dominated EBG yesterday we were barely out ppting green because they had hordes of guild groups running around desert BL, so I don't get the excuse that they were somehow outnumbered or incapacitated. They just didn't want the fight.
  9. Mag it's likely because of coverage, though they were in first and solidly second before it became possible for BG to drop from T1 Was logged in last evening on both EBG and Mag home BL - emptier than my heart. I'm on FC so could be coverage, could be Mag super-secret tanking Plan #1 which we are not privy to. ;) Unlike other servers, Mag's "coverage" deficiency isn't about time zone, it's about time of the week: Reset through following Wed -- high coverageThu/Fri -- everyone disappears Guess everyone on Mag works 2 x 24 on those 2 days. All I know is Mag was solidly ahead until the last 18
×
×
  • Create New...