Zombiesbum.3502

You seem to be under the impression that playing solo is not common. How much of your play time is done with an organized group I wonder.

If you are unwilling to prove it, don't say it. You'd have to be stupid if you think people should believe what you say based on your word alone.

You are entitled to you opinions, no matter how illogical they are. Just please don't try to tell me they are factual when they objectively aren't. I also find it funny how your retort to my argument was "this is an argument?", as if to imply you need no rebuttal. And this attitude of "we don't get patches so let's give up" while being on the forum arguing over issues is oxymoron at best. It really amazes me how little self awareness you are showing. Not only are your arguments non existent, but you even say that you don't care about the mode you are arguing over. You just outed yourself as a contrarian, and nobody likes this kind of attitude. Again, your whole argument is assuming that the 3v3 mode is by default made solely for premade teams. You need to prove that in order for your argument to have a leg to stand on. And you can't do that because the reality is; it's not made solely for premade teams (because you can solo Q). Not only that, but if that was the case, then it would be a dead mode. My argument has always been to make the mode fair, whether that is to remove solo Q, or remove premades. The only reason I lean towards removing premades is because most players play these modes as solo players. It's just logical to go with the majority here.

If 3v3 and 2v2 aren't made for solo players, then why can you solo queue into it? Your logic of "it wasn't made for solo" falls apart the moment someone thinks about the reality of the mode. And the reason you are unable to convince me is because your arguments make no sense. Stop blaming others for not getting your points if your points are shite.

Comparing an online competitive game mode to a birthday party. And you want me to take you seriously? If you want to mock someone's argument, at least come up with an analogy that actually makes a lick of sense.

I don't understand how you can't see that there is already a mode for premade teams. Yet you seem determined to explain how every game mode with a team should be premades only. That's how you come across.

You are talking about win trading, of which is not relevant to the topic at hand. You know you can always play unranked if you want to play with friends. I really find it odd how people can defend trio queuing in a mode that primarily has solo players in it.

Except that 90% of players play as solo, so your logic is invalid when we look at reality over your ideals.

You know what competitive integrity means right? It's not about me having a disadvantage by playing solo. It's about those who don't play solo getting an advantage. There will always be solo players, and If I teamed up I would get that advantage too, but guess what? That still means there is a lack of competitive integrity. I don't want to artificially increase my rank, and by that some notion I don't want to be at a disadvantage when I do play against premade teams. I really don't see how that is hard to understand. But apparently people on the forums project motive for some reason.

Then remove solo Q and see what happens to the game mode. Unfortunately your argument in not valid because the mode requires solo players for it to not die in a fire. And let me throw your own BS logic back in your face; If you want to play as a premade team, don't play a mode that lets players solo. Go play tournaments.

Because competitive integrity should be upheld?

Title.

I have the same issue. Maybe it has something to do with not owning the pet, but having it (and naming it) in PvP? Really silly bug tbh and it's still not fixed.

All bls were also full and with queues, took 20 mins to move 1 place. Maybe you shouldn't be such a toxic kitten.

That just sounds like you didn't consider the point I made, and now instead of saying that you didn't consider that, you are hiding behind vague statements.