Kicast.1459

What do you mean here ? No refresh of pages in Mist ?

Tomes accessibility limited by CD and energy (pages recharge) is bad design. Anet has to choose on how they want to limit. (And energy is the worst case solution that we see since start with thief: stupid spamming always on same skill) And please stop of all this mess of new types of CD skill that are not impacted the same way skills: CDs not affected by Alacrity Buffs that can not be removed from buff strip .... Now for Firebrand we have 4 way of limiting skill and related effects accessibility: Cd on tomes skill Cd on traits Energy Tomes debuffs Comon Anet seriously...why always adding mess to the mess ?

Nerf is needed every phase before an expansion.

Is it me or do the skills look slow as hell ? If not mistaken, you will hit nothing with the auto and the 2.

Bots are a way to limit population drop down. In rocket league when a player is missing...you have a bot to replace him. With this long silence and no action from Anet with all reports made on bots I am convinced that they are anet's bot.

But WvW is full of Revs NecrosPvp is busted by thieves and guardians are close to disapear. Are we talking about a PVE issue ?If yes lol sorry.

In the end if I understand well, it is not so strong.We just have to predict Spamable spells, dodge every second and cleansee every 3 second (not before else we die from confusion). Sounds fair, balanced and perfectly manageable. Thief is fine thanks again anet

you can't be a good dueller with top mobility.if you are you shut down all classes weaker than you.this is braindead easy to understand...but Anet.is still strufgling at it. Why the hell thief remains top mobility since beginning of the game ?And nerf short bow 5...for love of god.

I agree with CesarWorst design ever.

working as intended...good design

Significant balance update ?With which significant developper team ?

Why did we have to wait for so long for such obvious adjustments(because this is just adjustment here)2 years almost and this was not done...omg...One could argue that it is better late than never... but Jesus.... this is very late.

Too late.... bye bye

This is a nice finger from Anet to all pvp players.Do the skritt yell F U ?

Anet are doing a good job as usual.Is the skill still disabled?How can we know it works or not ?

Good news ... we have a test server and it is available not only on myst but everywhere.Tyria wvw hot pof ....They do hotfix on it and sometimes even dare deactivating traits on it. They call it production.

While we are at it...can you disable sword 2 on thief please ?Just because.Thanks.

The kill / nerf like the did before Pof & Hot.Expansion coming.But they can throw it where you know this time...

Lock him down with CI....lol Thank you Anet again for lazzy fix.Maybe we can hope to have a tooltip fix next patch to explain us that the trait is not working on purpose in pvp...

+1You are one of too many concern player who want the best for the game: i completely understand all of what you said. You are right about many thing including Gw2 having great potential. Unfortunately, Anet had 6 years+ to turn the game around but refused to. This... it is not the game that is dead...I feel it is a company policy issue... and I feel (fear) it will not change

Ah, good 'ol response #10247 Stay tuned!!?

Dear Anet ...thank you so much to give me what I have been crying for so many months other profession had and not me.Before I felt it was poor balance unfun to play against. Now I feel that it is funny.Everyone can change its mind after all. Scrappy scrapper

do nothing about bot please...we would have 10 minutes waiting queues if they remove 30% of active pvp accounts ;)

3 months of dishonnor?Good. I think we can now safely say that we can freely wintrade as soon as we have more than 2 accounts.Anet should maybe warn to avoid wintrading with the two accounts at the same time however.This is a good news for cheaters.Thanks a lot ?

Is there first a clear rule on tp ?When in theory are we supposed to be able to tp and when not ? Then we will be able to say when there is bug. I think (read fear)the rule is kind of "when there is a valid path you can use to reach the point without jumping" and "the point is in range by flight" An alternative could be... same but the valid path without jumping should be in range as well(hope this is not the case) My preferred one which is not the current one for sure:Just make sure the point is in range by flight.prevent tp in jumping puzzles and that's all.