-
Posts
534 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Everything posted by Deadmoose.6594
-
Bladesworn actually very viable.
Deadmoose.6594 replied to JinONplay.8905's topic in Player vs. Player
It’s a love/hate relationship for me, and probably for a lot of people. Only pvp that remotely compares to it for me was wow pvp at times. -
I don’t see how hard it is to just slowly scale things back that seem overpowered. There doesn’t need to be a fotm, wouldn’t it be nice if every spec was viable?
-
Trevor Boyer quit? Boy ain't posted in a month.
Deadmoose.6594 replied to magickthief.6492's topic in Player vs. Player
Who really knows how they decide what gets buffed or nerf, but yeah core guard seems decent and I don’t have any complaints fighting against it -
Its time for Guardian Ports to get cast times.
Deadmoose.6594 replied to Eurantien.4632's topic in Player vs. Player
Only WB should really have an instant port, because thats really all it has. DH shouldn't be, they have too much already. I'm ok with core guard because they're usually pretty slow anyway and they don't do much dmg. -
With all my kittens on this post I'm actually surprised I didn't get a forum ban.
-
Well said, you're right they go too extreme. When I ask for nerfs I actually don't want for them to nerf something so extreme that nobody wants to play it anymore. Actually I think they tried to nerf DH recently but it really wasn't enough. The other problem is if something isn't OP, people won't bandwagon onto it because they want that power over other people in a match. They'll just move on to the next OP thing. I personally play the same things regardless of what happens to buffs or nerfs with my specs, but I rotate out based on team comp.
-
Trevor Boyer quit? Boy ain't posted in a month.
Deadmoose.6594 replied to magickthief.6492's topic in Player vs. Player
druids, eles, thieves, and dh's are on my kitten list. -
Anet balance team needs to read this line 50 times each so they can understand where their game is at right now.
-
Bladesworn actually very viable.
Deadmoose.6594 replied to JinONplay.8905's topic in Player vs. Player
I won’t take that bet, my ban is coming as soon as the forum mods wake up -
By competitive do you mean sweaty? To me it seems like the higher rank you go the more abusing toxic specs there is, the less fun the game is overall. I also speculate that most people who climb any higher are duos, and its probably super rare for a soloq to be that high. anyway taking a forum ban out of protest for how bad the balancing is so won’t reply for a while.
-
i escaped my forum action and live another day
-
Both of my specs are obsolete compared to all other specs. Power chrono can't even one shot people anymore, and once its all spent class is worthless because its glass. Druid just kittens up reaper with daze and roots. Game just sucks, kitten this stupid kitten kittening kitten mother kittening piece of kitten worst kittening game in the kittening world go suck my kittening balls mother kitteners who made this stupid kittening kitten and are responsible for balancing the game dumb kittening worthless pieces of kittening kitten.
-
Bladesworn actually very viable.
Deadmoose.6594 replied to JinONplay.8905's topic in Player vs. Player
Someone has been complaining about nerf threads, yet there are so many people calling out druids and dh’s. They’re bound to be nerfed , therefore the nerf threads actually matter. -
Trevor Boyer quit? Boy ain't posted in a month.
Deadmoose.6594 replied to magickthief.6492's topic in Player vs. Player
Nah he probably just doesn’t have any conspiracy theories to bring up right now. Our posts are very different… -
I don’t see a lot of cond chronos, I play power personally depending on the situation. Really just giving people stacks of vulnerability, which alone doesn’t kill them. Reaper aoe doesn’t seem that overpowered, its just chill and fear with staff and some elites but they aren’t bringing opponents down. In the aoe cond conversation I think the ones that do burning or other damage types are more to blame.
-
The REAL reason people AFK ranked matches
Deadmoose.6594 replied to Buzzbugs.1236's topic in Player vs. Player
As I sit here lately winning more games than I lose, soloQ and climbing the ranks from gold 1 to gold 3. -
This guy knows exactly what I’m talking about and feeling against a competent druid. If you disagree you’re just not fighting against this caliber druid or you are one of them. When he says you simply can’t play the game, that’s what I mean. It’s not fun to play against, similar to how its not fun to play against thief because of their kittening annoying invis. Actually, I’ve been finding thief much less annoying than druid.
-
I’m almost a gold 3 with around 1500 games played
-
The REAL reason people AFK ranked matches
Deadmoose.6594 replied to Buzzbugs.1236's topic in Player vs. Player
Did you just quote yourself? The nerf crying works, and as long as I play pvp I'll never stop, get over it. -
The REAL reason people AFK ranked matches
Deadmoose.6594 replied to Buzzbugs.1236's topic in Player vs. Player
Give more meaningful rewards for a loss. Problem solved. People would be less salty about losing if they got their participation rewards. Why not? You literally get participation rewards in wvw. Why not pvp? Is a pvp’ers time less valuable than a wvwer? Winning/losing should affect rank and thats it, they tied rewards to winning which was a mistake right off the bat. -
If it were that bad, I wouldn’t be seeing a druid in almost every match…
-
Sure except when I try to chill a druid = “miss” no dodge roll, no block, just miss oh
-
He did this to me too on another thread, I wouldn't pay attention to him because he tries to argue but he doesn't seem to know what he's talking about.
-
The REAL reason people AFK ranked matches
Deadmoose.6594 replied to Buzzbugs.1236's topic in Player vs. Player
Yeah I'm not going to argue with someone who says "good players win bad players lose" and then restates that the matchmaker trends 50/50. So which is it? You don't even have a point, so there's no point in talking to you.