-
Posts
6,865 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Ashen.2907's Achievements
-
subtle graphic effects [appreciation for devs]
Ashen.2907 replied to Crystal Paladin.3871's topic in Guild Wars 2 Discussion
In general the use of effects on screen or around the border to represent a variety of statuses, etc, is really very cool. -
[Suggestions]QoL (Quality of Life) Ideas [Merged]
Ashen.2907 replied to ginryu.3026's topic in Guild Wars 2 Discussion
Not at all irrelevant. You are asking for a feature to be copied from arguably the least usefull mount to the one that already has the greatest utility. This would lessen the relative value of the Turtle. Personally I see the turtle in use in a broad spectrum of OW maps. I am assuming that this is because of the multiple rider function or aesthetics. Regardless, Ive seen no compelling justification for increasing the utility of the highest utility mount let alone at the cost of the uniqueness of a lesser mount. -
[Suggestions]QoL (Quality of Life) Ideas [Merged]
Ashen.2907 replied to ginryu.3026's topic in Guild Wars 2 Discussion
Making the turtle less useful by giving its biggest advantage to the most useful mount in the game wouldnt help with that. -
Please allow us to name our pets and mini's
Ashen.2907 replied to Tinker.6924's topic in Guild Wars 2 Discussion
I would enjoy being able to name my minipets so that my beast master themed Ranger could have have his actual pets, his minipet, and perbaps even his rune summon pet.....oh, never mind. I changed the build when I lost the summon. -
[Suggestions]QoL (Quality of Life) Ideas [Merged]
Ashen.2907 replied to ginryu.3026's topic in Guild Wars 2 Discussion
I dont think that giving the mosf versatile mount in the game features of other mounts is a good idea. Right now the Turtle has a couple of points of uniqueness. Giving one of them away to a higher utility mount seems like a bad idea. -
Man, but I didn't even get to BE disappointed by the new weapons
Ashen.2907 replied to itspomf.9523's topic in Professions
My employer does not get the benefits of my labor for free. I doubt that the OP works for free either. Why would anyone expect to get the fruit of another's labor without paying for it. Slavery is bad. -
He said over the course of two annual expacs.
-
For those who had legendary runes ANet did not just, "give," a 1400g legendary, they returned functionality that had been taken from players.
- 115 replies
-
- 12
-
Not faulting you for bringing this up here but, since metabattle is not associated with ANet, you might want to consider bringing it up to them directly.
-
subtle graphic effects [appreciation for devs]
Ashen.2907 replied to Crystal Paladin.3871's topic in Guild Wars 2 Discussion
This one impressed me from day one. I excitedly called my wife over to my computer to show off the effect. -
My lack of interest in something, an achievement for example, is not an indication that said something is bad. I dislike polka music, that does not make polka music bad. There was no logical flaw. When dealing with completely optional things such as an achievement the decision to pursue it is evidence, proof actually, that the individual found the reward worth the time/effort. There is no other reason, beyond someone accidentally getting the achievement I suppose, for that individual to put in the effort. The individual saw the effort, saw the reward, and chose to put in the effort. Obviously this would be a different matter entirely if the pursued item was in some way mandatory.