Greiger.7092

Skin: Charr cultural drover leggingsRace: Charr FemaleClass: Any mediumIssue: There are a number of noticeable holes in the legging model under the charr's tail, 2 on one side, and an identical 2 on the other. I did not notice the issue before the living world season 4 update, so I think it's new. Any of the 'trenchcoat' chests may hide it, but when bare chested or with any chest skins that stop at the waist it becomes quite visible. Screenshot below

A bit too long of a thread to read every post here, so I'll throw out a few thoughts and if anyone already mentioned them, consider that me seconding the suggestion. Another How to Dance book. I have vol 1 from ages ago and I love it. Would love more, especially if you can condense the books into 1 slot by using the weapon skillslots, or with a menu asking which volume to open. Not like you can be in combat with it active anyway.I've seen a lot of folks asking for bikini outfits. I think that could be done a more entertaining way. Gem store underwear. Dyeable alternate versions of the nude clothes. The non charr characters are already wearing something akin to swimwear when nude, why not make it customizable? I would love it if my main charr could ditch that odd looking chestwrap that does not actually cover anything at the very least. It's odd that my skallywag chest has her exposing her chest for all to see in fine berzerker tradition, but take that off and she feels she needs to cover herself with a ratty looking cloth that isn't even on the model to block the view of anything.More emotes.Alternate voices. Even if just outside story. I think the current voice actors do great work, and I love the charr female voice, I think Kate Miller did an awesome job doing a female voice that I can legitimately believe is coming out something as big and tough as a charr. And she is singlehandedly the reason why my main is a fem charr, But I have more than 2 charr characters(I love the race conceptually) and It would be nice if I could have a different voice to differentiate.

Race: CharrGender: Female (likely male as well, as male seems to use the same model)Profession: GuardianItem: Scallywag legs skin I'm not sure if this is intentional or not since the charr chest armor for this skinset does not care about covering up for gender, and the skin seems to be a more barbarian look, but the legs lack any kind of undergarments under the kilt on charr. Really only majorly noticable when swimming or gliding. I can probably post a screenshot if needed, but just figuring that even with a charr character you may not want me to. :p

this is exactly what I'm talking about here... why are we cutting our own throats by telling Anet what the best way is to squeeze more money out of us? I'm not picking on the person here, but this idea of settling for the lesser of 2 evils when there is a third choice of no evil at all, just boggles my mind! Because this isn't a perfect world, for all we know it's corporate politics forcing the devs to implement a system like this. It would be a lot easier for the devs to print this stuff out to show their overlords things that show a meaningful attempt at a compromise than half a million 'lol no' posts. You are kidding yourself if you think that the people who pushed for this don't already know about how much players would hate the current implementation. Complaining about it and saying just get rid of the rng isn't going to happen cuz guess what, they would have done that if they could. You don't invent a new system when the current one is working fine. Meaningful alternatives might actually DO something.

I admit, I did buy a good chunk of the mounts. I had a good chunk of gems sitting around collecting dust, and I dumped them all on this, I did get the mounts I wanted. However, that was about 8000 gems. I am not entirely happy about that. I know it's probably too late to easily remove the rng vouchers entirely, but perhaps a nice compromise is in order? How about keeping the rng but have the mounts on a cycle for sale directly in the bl gem store? Maybe on a rotation? Every couple weeks one mount of each type goes up for sale for 800 gems or so (price to be decided by you guys of course, just an example). People who want to be patient can still be guaranteed get the one they want for a small premium with a little patience, potentially keeping a player on the fence about continuing playing ingame because they don't wanna miss the mount they want. While other folks who wanna take their chances, or the gambling types, can still try for they want for the 400 gems with a voucher. Trying to be a bit more reasonable and less hyperbolic than most of the posts I read so far and offer a solution. Sounds like a win win for both sides to me, how bout you all? I mean seriously, the current implementation has pissed off Jim Sterling, and a lot of people agree with Jim Sterling.