Riba.3271

You do love your percentages but you don't know how to use it. Slow attackers by 20% based on what number where? You can buff wall and gate hitpoints by 25%, then attackers take 20% stronger to breach 1/1.25 *100% = 80%. You can also increase supply costs of some siege.

You just need more time, right? If you slow down attackers at one objective by 20%, then after they take couple objectives you suddenly have 5 minutes more to build defenses. Obviously with linking system, it is hard to have ton of players one discord message away from logging in, but it is still doable. Main reason why competitive commanders with numbers didn't tag up to defend was because defending was not competitive environment. Even if you managed to barely defend, it didn't translate to being able to attack due to massive stat swings (1200+ stats, so 45% damage worth, when speaking about keeps)

You just need more time, right? If you slow down attackers at one objective by 20%, then after they take couple objectives you suddenly have 5 minutes more to build defenses. Obviously with linking system, it is hard to have ton of players one discord message away from logging in, but it is still doable. Main reason why competitive commanders with numbers didn't tag up to defend was because defending was not competitive environment. Even if you managed to barely defend, it didn't translate to being able to attack due to massive stat swings (1200+ stats, so 45% damage worth, when speaking about keeps)

You just need more time, right? If you slow down attackers at one objective by 20%, then after they take couple objectives you suddenly have 5 minutes more to build defenses. Obviously with linking system, it is hard to have ton of players one discord message away from logging in, but it is still doable. Main reason why competitive commanders with numbers didn't tag up to defend was because defending was not competitive environment. Even if you managed to barely defend, it didn't translate to being able to attack due to massive stat swings (1200+ stats, so 45% damage worth, when speaking about keeps)

You just need more time, right? If you slow down attackers at one objective by 20%, then after they take couple objectives you suddenly have 5 minutes more to build defenses or gather numbers. Obviously with linking system, it is hard to have ton of players one discord message away from logging in, so that is partly at fault. Main reason why competitive commanders with numbers didn't tag up to defend was because defending was not competitive environment. Even if you managed to barely defend, it didn't translate to being able to attack due to massive stat swings (1200+ stats (45% damage) when speaking about keeps). Now WvW will slowly return to state where commander going for an objective is not hated by most of competitive playerbase anymore.

Yes, but ballista siege damage was already adjusted in patch where they added 4 skill and reworked 3 skill. So ballista would not be buffed. Indeed, attacker catapults, arrow carts and trebutchets would destroy siege easier, but it isn't necessarily bad to speed up things that attackers actively chose to do. Yes, this is why golems will be nerfed, shield gens reworked to 1 bubble/spot and wall/gate buffed. With siege vs siege damage buffs, this will give you plenty of time to damage attacker siege. Do note that if siege vs siege damage is buffed by 50%, then rams do 33% less damage before dying to trebs. And if walls/gates are 20% stronger, then same minimum ram setup as in current patch would require 1/(0.66/1.2)= 82% more rams to breach treb fortified gate. Siege vs siege damage was nerfed by 50%, attacker golems are affected by boons now, attackers have shield gens available now, keeps/castles upgrade several times faster now, dolyaks are practically invulnerable when escorted, attackers have access to ton more supply and so on. There are lot of "over the top" changes ANet did to objective balance so it is hard for me to blame bad infrastructural balance to "bad map design". In what world would halving or doubling somethings damage or speed lead to better balance.

It isn't just about buffing siege vs siege damage. It is because trebutchets and arrow carts used to do 2x damage to siege in the past, so one player could make attackers rethink where to attack twice. In the past if you had 1 trebutchet behind gate, you could quite often stop the attackers from just slapping rams there. Currently with halved siege vs siege damage and shield generators, there is very little you can do to force attackers to choose more time consuming strategies. Yes, golems are absolutely busted right now. Glad you understand this. They were already usable before patch where they made them affected by boons due to being upfront investment, flexible and having immunity to CC. Their bubble skill and ability to hit arrow carts on walls also added ton of utility.

Duels don't happen near structures for this reason, you are just talking about random 1v1 fights It seems you are not aware that objective auras zones are same as gliding zones. Meaning it includes all areas around SM, near bay or south camp on borderlands. So the typical dueling spots.

I would also suggest following defence adjustment: Keep require 50% dolyaks more to upgrade and Stonemist castle 100%. With release of Heart of Thorns keeps, towers and castles were all made to require same amount of dolyaks. This ment keeps and castles upgrade in less than 1 hour when some towers will still take 8 hours. The system was oversimplified and it broke the balance with the map design. Keep and castle upgrading speed was boosted up way too much. With the defense buffs in original post, it is quite reasonable that bigger objectives would require bit more time to upgrade. Packed dolyaks only count as 1 dolyak for upgrade but carry 4x supply. Right now packed dolyak just does everything speedy does but better: more supply and more upgrade speed. Right now you can give Packed dolyak superspeed and you upgrade 4 times faster compared to camp with no tactivators or speed boosters. Speedy dolyaks should be about faster upgrading, and packed dolyaks about supply. As intended. I don't think the game should be about having to speed dolyaks to min-max or one tactivator always being better than another. I put this in separate comment so defence fanatics can love the original post and hate this one.

So now equally numbered groups can fight each other in semifair environment regardless of location. It was great patch, but it obviously very lacking in keeping defense interesting What is not so great is how siege weapons are a joke. There were some questionable changes in the past to siege balance, and now siege does nothing to slow down the attackers. Golems supplied with boons and Shield generators will still crack any outnumbered defense with 100% success rate. Active defense buffs required: Siege vs Siege damage increased by at least 50%. In patch July 2016 siege damage to siege was halved because of an oversight that siege does not crit. This was never returned to reasonable levels. Oil, cannons, mortars and ballistas have been adjusted since and shouldn't be included. Golems unaffected by boons again. For a long time Siege Golems were unaffected by boons. Then it was changed. This means right now siege golems deal 70% more damage (quickness + might) and take 33% less siege damage (protection). This is too strong and they just outperform all other siege options. If they were underpowered before, then maybe they need small buff to conpensate, but adding potentially 50% more health and 70% more damage was an overkill. Guild Golems cost should be raised to 80 supplies. Obviously 50 supplies is too little for better ram that can destroy multiple gates. Guild golems supply cost should match other guild siege. Shield generators: Force Dome (Bubble skill) should only occur around the shield generator and shield generators should be limited to 1/spot with separate siege cap. This would still keep shield generators usable, but limit them to 1/spot and make them more vulnerable. Wall/Gate hitpoints increased by 20%. Even though fights are fair now, people still need more time to run from spawn to respond to attackers actions. Since HoT attackers have had easy access to guild siege and +10 supply allowing them to build much more siege and be in lord room faster. Response time given need to match the powercreep of siege cost and supply carry capacity. Intent of these changes is not to make keeps and towers impenetrable. They're just slight buffs that defenders might be able to fend off stronger attackers once or twice. Eventually you will run of supply and lose it if you're still much weaker than the attacking group, but at least you would have time to do something before that. This will translate to massive difference in experience as a defender: You will have viable actions to help your team available and time to implement it.

If you fight against noobs*. It is pretty normal in high level duel for winning player to go below 20% health at some point.

Anyone who doesnt understand importance of 800 stat swings (~30%) damage in 1vs1 is either terrible at gameplay or math. Dueling scene flourishes when better player wins most duels, server you are in does not matter (SM/SC ownership) and you can duel same person 2 different days regardless of map state

What these changes are doing are just continuing to kill servers that don't have a lot of blob guilds. Every time I see blobs on other servers, I just automatically log out of the WvW. Do note that these blob guilds have much easier time now. So they will either be bored and disband, become weaker or opponents will finally adapt and become stronger. What this patch did was actually make the game more fun for non-stackers since they can fight each other in objectives now, rather than balance being disorganised inexperienced people being able to defend against organised experienced people.

You were being face rolled by roamers and Havocs? What numbers were defeating your Squads? This was already happening. I don't understand what you were facing. You didn't have Havocs attacking you? Smaller organized groups were already attacking larger groups, was this not happening on your server? Ah so you were losing to clouds versus adapting to them. If you were NA I would say to Mag, +1 on that score. Mag I think you killed too many Anet Devs here, so I blame you peeps though I look forward to the next fights. Um, if your groups weren't balancing their attacks, that's on them. Use the right level of group for the right objective. Zerg less, spread more, hit multiple targets and its not an issue. Lol, zerg more, check. So again to counter this play. If they bring their map zerg and you don't have the boons to counter, let them ktrain, take everything else and allow your roamers to snipe their tailfeathers. Anet, when do we get reasons to win? So you are all for 50 v 5. Check. Zerg less maybe? Stop attacking empty structures and use more to do less. Take the time to engage and use tactics to take. Stop looking for a 5 minute fight. Use tactics and wear things done, play smarter and pre-siege, pre-take camps, wear down a defense. Take the time it takes to defeat an objective versus complain it took time to take it. If I need to take 2 hours to wear down a structure to allow my side better odds to take it. As a Roamer or in a Havoc, it was time well spent. Use more resources and zerg less. I was replying to a roamer. The fact that you assume I only do zerg fights is disrespectful considering I have been in highest rated sPvP lobbies every time I play sPvP. I am also a scout and roam a lot. You are very rude when painting me to be zerg only player. All I wanted was good 1vs1s and 50vs50s. I would stay away making baseless assumptions as living within falsehood will prevent you from becoming good player. I have made various suggestions for defense, solo scouting and roaming buffs in the past (evident from my comment history) so you arent exactly on right track. I cant really respect anyone who lies about others so blatantly, so all you did was lose all credibility

They said my point was wrong when I literally referred to engaging in my comments. It had nothing to do with easier and harder objectives existing. He misinterpreted what I was saying, then I explained what I ment and now you misintrepeted why I quoted him. If attacker can take easy objective (f/e anzalias), it still means they have to be stronger to take it even if it is one of the easier objectives on the map < - This was my point How he quoted me: "Riba is wrong because attackers have advantage because they can choose which objective they can take". No. If each individual objective is defenders advantage, then attackers dont have advantage. They are just better players if they take it