Jump to content
  • Sign Up

iNaddict.8021

Members
  • Posts

    57
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by iNaddict.8021

  1. Pretty sure he’s just trying to incite a reaction.., ignore him
  2. you would think the majority of those who care about performance, would just gravitate to the next best thing.. i do somewhat see, those who who never frequent the forums will just keep on carrying on like nothing happened.. those who truly just love the spec.. personally, i dont think it needed the last round of nerfs . it wasnt pulling stellar numbers..
  3. i shouldnt but i lold a little too hard at this
  4. i think there are a subset in that group who genuinely loved the pmech aesthetic.. its a difficult pill to swallow to be told play something else in the name of efficiency… specially when they had a taste of what was. . pmech wasnt top bench before rifle and mech genius changes as well, so its a little saltier..
  5. yeah.. does feel like that doesnt it.. i still think it a good thing that people who doesnt like a little a little difficulty could gravitate to the mech .. everyone else could stick to their preferred spec.. hopefully no more nerfs.. i do miss the machine gun though..
  6. I like this comment. . The “positioning skill” the current change is just playing where’s Waldo with your mech.. or recall him back.. shift signet etc.. it’s not fun, feels like baby sitting.. it used to be fun, being able to be in 2 places at once doing 2 things whilst also looking at ensuring your mech doesn’t get spanked and die.. that feels more fun..
  7. yes i concur… though it feels weird as a mechanic, as now you are punishing people using UI features.. i think auto cast, except for auto attack should just be disabled
  8. lol i think he/she understood the implication… i think reverting the changes is a good idea… remove the clunkiness.. make adjustments to the balance elsewhere.. preferably without introducing additional clunkiness
  9. id assume dps loss even if i take portal on with power dps chrono… saying that, it does feel harder to play compared to the other examples you mentioned..
  10. always smirk at that sorts of advice.. its akin tooo “dont want to be poor and have to choose? be rich instead” ps: i meant the advice you quoted.. not yours
  11. ive been conditioned to use force and impact for power and the condi dmg one for condi lol
  12. so, you a non mech main.. come to a mech thread telling mech main to “suck it up” what did you think would happen ?
  13. no that shouldnt be the case.. tested earlier and its working as per patch notes.. albeit took some time getting used to the new animation..
  14. To be fair i dont think the mech population is the whole game lol.. but i do remember those posts.. dont really know thats what kicked anet to action, maybe, probably .. i dont really know.. i think i saw some group of raiders trying to maybe do the same to bladesworns too.. with posts on their organized capabilities.. but wrong forum for that i guess..
  15. False narrative because it was my opinion? Then just leave at that.. I mentioned previously im not here to change your mind.. but here we are, pointing our my trying to lead the forums astray with false narratives.
  16. i mean all you are doing are personal jabs at what i posted.. why does my opinion matter to you.. clearly you dont think im right, and i dont think you will be able to influence me on your opinions me either way. im dodging the rest of your posts because , let me make sure its clear, i dont really want get in an argument with you. i was hoping you’d take the hint
  17. i mean you arent wrong here i guess.. jerks will be jerks with or without dps meters
  18. maybe i mistakenly attributed success in Soo Won metas (as an example) with the squad doing better dps .. because for sure i felt metas failed more prior the green sea.. maybe im just not as great at gw2 as you.. i can only share my experiences…
  19. i didnt remember it being worse.. i remember it as the same/similar .. how bad was your experience?
  20. ask in one of the forum posts.. im not a mech main, they may give you a better argument.. from my point of view they have the best way of applying dps.. numbers arent great in benchmarks, but great at applying it.. why are their numbers nerfed? i feel instead anet should pull out whats great about them and apply it to other classes.. perhaps dont just make it as simple, but simpler.. ill be honest, i like having them around.. things succeed more.. if you as a mech main think it’s justified then so be it, im not here to try and change your mind..
  21. is mech meta for pvp then? maybe not unfair to you.. im sure theres a group in this forum which may have a separate opinion
  22. I also said, I didn’t mind if it stayed.. mech users are happy.. we get a low difficulty spec anyone can use and performs well in OW events and metas.. now, probably still be ok but might be less successful.. I don’t think I requested a review of the changes or balance team decisions in my posts..
  23. I mean, I’d like to say that doesn’t happen now.. buuuut
  24. You seem to be coming at me hot… chill bro.. Yes amazing and easy dps.. and at 1200 range too.. skill are a little overloaded yes.. I would be fine if they left it as it is.. I do wonder if things would have changed had people not kicked up a fuss.. anyway .. it’s moot, change is done… lower the passion man.
  25. alright.. that works lol… end goal the same
×
×
  • Create New...