-
Posts
6 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Blogs
Events
Articles
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by Samaruis Vulcan.7413
-
-
3 Days and 10 pages later they finally acknowledge our existence. I have to say it's about time. I hope what we've said is taken into consideration Stephane, you guys kinda dropped the ball on this one. Here's hoping you can make it right.
-
@Bear.9568 said:
@arielwind.8921 said:Gw2 doesn't have even monthly subscription.Pfffff, 7yrs ago I marched my kitten into my local game stop and paid retail price for GW2.I pre-ordered a Collectors Edition at game stop, don't regret it. Still think this is 1 step forward 3 steps back.
-
I'm sorry, this is unacceptable. Arena Net, Are you wanting us to Chastise you? THIS SYSTEM WAS ALREADY DONE BETTER IN THE PREVIOUS GAME! How could you mess this up? You knew what we wanted! Now you're low blowing us like Bethesda! Selling more Game Play Features THAT SHOULD OF BEEN IN THE BASE GAME! I've been playing this Franchise since 2007 and this is insulting. I will not be supporting nor will I be using this system. Not like there is much options left to choose from especially after you streamlined the build templates in heart of thorns.
I think I'll be staying on Destiny 2 for a bit longer. They seem to know how to please a fan base for the time being. Good Luck trying to make your game into Guild Wars 76. This was such a bad time to release something so Greedy.
Should Arena Net Revisit Gliders with Back Items and make them Dyable?
in Guild Wars 2 Discussion
Posted
As the Title says, now that we have dyable capes, this raises the question about back items, both going forward as well as the old ones we already have. I'd like both for community feedback as well as perhaps getting the lovely developers attention to this little topic.
In all honesty I have no Idea why anyone would press option three, but I'm leaving it in for options sake.