HadrianBlackwater.5736

A-net could remove most doubts about the matchmaking by showing the MMRs of everyone in a match. Until they do I have no reason to 100% believe them. It doesn't have to be they are lieing either they could be mistaken themselves about there own code or it is sometimes acting in ways they don't fully understand. Smarter people then there coders make mistakes all the time. Blind faith is for little children. As for the evidence being anecdotal well they refuse to give us the full information that would prove themselves 100% correct so that's all I can say about that. I feel like when the playerbase makes a request devs should fullfill that request if it is reasonable. It would take little time to add a pvp window with both teams average MMR and the MMR of every player in the match without the names attached and possibly even the win probabilty they have calculated. More information is always better.

Averages doesnt mean anything. The poor matches that people are pissed about are hidden behind the good ones. Does 5 matches where everyone is within 35-50 MMR of each other justify 2 where there is a couple hundred MMR range between some players. I would say it does not and you need to tighthen up the allowable MMR range more and if the queues go up so be it. I dont want to play with people 100+ MMR below me ever. If the MMR rating is accurate at all they are not as good as me. I want to sink or swim playing with people as teamates that are exactly the same MMR as I am. I know it cant be exactly so I would say -50 below and +50 above. Why can't you at least try stricter rules and see what it does to the queues. You would be surprised I think how many would be willing to wait 5 - 7 minutes. Right now its 1-2 for me at least most of the time it doesnt need to be that fast.

Anybody who plays a lot sees behavior of this sort. I won like 9 out 10 the other day and then got two matches straight with two thieves on my team the other team had zero thiefs and 1 thief and were especially tanky and point dominant comps. I proceeded to lose both by an average score of about 500-200. I was ready to throw my computer out the window. They can say whatever they want but when you get on a win steak it definitely seems to look at it as a bogus event and tries to correct it by putting you in more difficult matches until you lose a few games. Its like your placement put you at 1450 good luck getting much past that for long.