JPUlisses.8756

I like elementalist pistol.

Considering WvW the pet would probably be best not ranged and preferably not so tanky, but more DPS oriented.

I don't think boon rip should be tied to anything. Just a pet timed rotation removing 1 single boon everyone. Keeping it simple. While that is better than nothing I would rather have a simple boon removal on the pet. Preferably on demand with f2 skill.

Can Rangers have a Boon Removal Pet? It is known that Untamed can remove boons, however having at least one boon removal in ranger druid southeast would be great. It can be tied to the beast skill so soulbeast does not have 2. And it's more on demand. But just 1 boon so it's not something that impacts too. Pets always have this thing that they can do everything and cover the ranger weakness, yet no boon removal even if just 1.

also happened to me twice in a row. This queue bug is annoying because it always moves you to the end of the queue!

big hopes for melee auto fast cleave

there used to be, sometimes they even streamed about it, but there always was one preview even if just the notes.

Is there any balance update preview?

Druid needs buffs the most.

Scourge gives alacrity and barrier. What weaver does better than scourge in raids? Ante needs to pay attention and not give everything to a single class and nothing to other.

One blue boy down 99999999999k more down to go. It is not like firebrand is not the best WvW class or anything by a mile

It just needs a bit more nerfs and maybe while still being the best support maybe it is a bit more fair and maybe one day not demanded in every WvW

We already have too many firebrand playing the game kthxbye

Before improving tempest they need to buff weaver more.

I can understand weaver but not tempest/cata Maybe buff weaver.

Play minion mancer

They can ask for it and it's fine. The game play is totally different in weaver even with just 1 element than catalyst and tempest because it is still more complex. But I don't suppose a cata or temp would ever understand. Weaver can be that single element and change to dual or have both choices sseparated. They were asking for it to be more simple by committing to a choice. Which would be optional as there is no way the dual elements would be removed from weaver. It doesn't have to be the simple rotation as other eles. Weaver just needs better power scaling so it can have decent options there, and adding a power stance would do just that and it could be powered by two different elements just like primordial stance but with a more power theme instead of condition.

People want weaver not other specs. If they wanted other specs they wouldn't play weaver. Weaver is not cata/tempest. The fact that I have to explain this such obvious explains a lot of the on going cata/tempest whining for buffs constantly.

Remove Unravel. Add a minor trait that allows this single element at a time. Add a new stance skill for power based characters similar to primordial stance but with power scaling.

It is obvious that Anet favouritism wise: Catalyst > Tempest > Core > Weaver

Nerf catalysts, not all the elementalists specs. Edit: I know cata crybabies are going to cry for buffs.

And that shouldn't be a problem. Selfish classes are ok as long they don't also require others. It makes way less sense that mechanist has everything and weaver has nothing. Now weaver getting self alac and/or self quickness would be way too fun and no one would play catalyst/tempest unless forced to for party content and that would create other problems.

It is obvious that Anet favouritism wise: Catalyst > Tempest > Core > Weaver

Using x3d 1080p all on ultra except reflections and shadows and character limit. LoD effects off. 60fps always. Going to test 4k once I have a 4k monitor, might need to tweak some things to keep stability.

The problem of weaver is that cata gives more quickness and tempest gives more alac. Sure weaver is more fun but others don't care about your fun.