Theandil.6045 Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 Simple, as topic say Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theandil.6045 Posted November 8, 2017 Author Share Posted November 8, 2017 Typo in Poll, but w/e Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eros.6801 Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 Cuz its the only reason why i play thief. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saerni.2584 Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 Third option for middle ground.Remove the anti regen aspect. Replace with a fixed endurance cost per movement impairing condition removed.Immobilize -20 enduranceCripple -10 enduranceChill -10 endurance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phosphorite.6192 Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 Third option like saerni says but instead of "paying with endurance" have an ICD for the debuff removal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyT.7192 Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 Or just revert it and not touch it ever again, I don’t know what it issue was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neurion.4086 Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 Just revert it back. I am not for a middle-ground solution because I don't negotiate with Karl McLain and his team: time and time again they have been kittening Thief class for years now, for no good reason at all. The pure, unexplained, hate of other classes towards us is not a good enough reason but rather a pretext. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tails.9372 Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 @BobbyT.7192 said:I don’t know what it issue was.It's a balance patch and they want to include every class somehow. Whether or not the changes actually make sense is irrelevant to them. Just like with the removal of the ricochet trait, A-Net's logic in regard to thief: when in doubt -> nerf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fiddle Irk.9710 Posted November 10, 2017 Share Posted November 10, 2017 I would return it personally, but if compromise must be made, either the the icd on removing condition ( 3 seconds to match weavers would be fair) or the slight increase in endurance cost when removing would be acceptable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ysmir.4986 Posted November 10, 2017 Share Posted November 10, 2017 I vote to revert it, but if a nerf on UC must be, so be it : just in a different form that is not so ridiculously punishing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.