Riba.3271 Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 (edited) I know alliances are towards end of their development and might release in 2025 if we are lucky (joke btw), but unlinked servers are just ridiculous and cannot be kept as it is so long. All 3 of them are in bottom tiers. Every relinking. Some of them are even marked full. Maybe if you don't have enough servers to give each server (pairing) possibility to have same amount of population, you most likely need less tiers and maybe even remove 3 of the smallest servers and give the people there like 1000 gems or something. Frankly, system that removes the most mainstream entertaining servers possiblity from staying such, can be only perceived terrible. Remove the servers that no one wants to play on, instead of making the ones that most people want to play on unplayable. Edited March 1 by Riba.3271 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riba.3271 Posted March 1 Author Share Posted March 1 Oh yeah, as a side note, I do think that having 15 unlinked servers and 5 tiers would be better than any linking or alliance system. Let entertaining servers have more people. Build your server and see it thrive, or fail and die. I am just compromising here to make this linking system so that it doesn't unfairly punish people for playing or putting effort to provide great times. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Random dude.5089 Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 58 minutes ago, Riba.3271 said: I know alliances are towards end of their development and might release in 2025 if we are lucky (joke btw), but unlinked servers are just ridiculous and cannot be kept as it is so long. All 3 of them are in bottom tiers. Every relinking. Some of them are even marked full. Maybe if you don't have enough servers to give each server (pairing) possibility to have same amount of population, you most likely need less tiers and maybe even remove 3 of the smallest servers and give the people there like 1000 gems or something. Frankly, system that removes the most mainstream entertaining servers possiblity from staying such, can be only perceived terrible. Remove the servers that no one wants to play on, instead of making the ones that most people want to play on unplayable. some unlinked servers were still dominating even if its rank 5 , ridge on eu dominating our week even tho gunnars and ring of fire is rank 2 , and ridge is rank 5 and is even linked with another tier 5 , what u said legit doesn't make sense , unless u actualy take a good look at all the servers and at least face a lot of them and you'll understand that even a tier 5 can stomp the kitten out of tier 2 servers. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
subversiontwo.7501 Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 We all know it They all know it They don't care (enough) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now