Would you pay for the Hall of Heroes(8v8) and GVG from GW1.

[ChronosCosmos.9450]

Would you pay for Hall of Heroes and GvG expansions if you had to buy it?

[witcher.3197]

I would have prefered HoH (HA) to ATs tbh.

It'd be up all day and provide a great sense of progression and accomplishment.

[ChronosCosmos.9450]

@witcher.3197 said:I would have prefered HoH (HA) to ATs tbh.

It'd be up all day and provide a great sense of progression and accomplishment.

Yeah HoH is great. Please bring both lol

[Stand The Wall.6987]

i would pay for this.

[pah.4931]

Votes yes, but with a caveat. I would pay for a "PvP Pack" that had a lot more game modes and other goodies just for PvP.

[Eddbopkins.2630]

These things should already be in the game. I mean gw2 is a legacy game of gw1 is it not? They share the same name guild wars and are set in the same universe just years later. If i have to pay for what was in the original game i will but i wouldnt be happy about it at all. I personally like to spend my money on new content not something that was thought up and implemented years ago in an older title.

Dont get me wrong here i would absolutely love to see and 8v8 hoh in gw2

[SnowdropFox.2456]

Hell yeah, bring back lot's of stuff from GW1, so I can stop missing it.

[Ayrilana.1396]

How’s 8v8 GvG any different than 8v8 sPvP?

[ChronosCosmos.9450]

@Ayrilana.1396 said:How’s 8v8 GvG any different than 8v8 sPvP?

GvG in GW1 was done in Guild Halls and the objectives were a lot different. The group of 8 had to split a lot for different objectives. Hall of Heroes was an 8v8 where teams fought each other to move up the ladder of the tournament. At the end of the tournament there was a 3 way where they fight to win. Winners got rewarded with a special end chest which dropped rare items that were worth thousands of gold. In HoH it wasn't just a fight, you had to complete objectives too. The game modes were really fun and competitive. sPvP in GW2 only has conquest. GW1 had a lot more variety in PvP objectives.

[Ryan.9387]

What do I select if I'm willing to pay $10?

Useless poll if you can't provide unbiased choices.

[Vieux P.1238]

Nope! i put anoth money into it.. Need for Anet to show us what they got to keep me playing before i dish out more $$$.

[Zaraki.5784]

Middle ground, I wouldn't pay for that but I would be interested if they release it for free (or only pay if that'd come along with a major expansion (like HoT or PoF)).

[ChronosCosmos.9450]

True, I just wanted to see what the demand for this content is and if people are willing to pay a large sum xd.> @Ryan.9387 said:

What do I select if I'm willing to pay $10?

Useless poll if you can't provide unbiased choices.

[sephiroth.4217]

Not interested in paying for something they should put into the game for free.

@Ryan.9387 said:What do I select if I'm willing to pay $10?

Useless poll if you can't provide unbiased choices.

Every poll is useless with thinking like that :lol:

[shadowpass.4236]

I voted yes, but I don't want to pay $20 dollars for something that should've been in the base game to begin with.

[Wizardauz.3761]

Dont think we should need to pay for it if thats all were getting.

If Anet wants to come out with an xpac level of content for WvW/sPvP along with heavy balancing on Core/HoT professions to bring them back into the light then i would consider paying

[Kamskill.5901]

I think GvG with a power ranking is really needed in this game, a lot of people are interested in it and it will add some competition to the game which is something lacking except for the pvp.

[Arheundel.6451]

With the current balancet?...Not a fat chance! All you'd see is condi mirages/scourges...not a chance in hell I'd pay for that

[Abazigal.3679]

To be honest, we had a view of what GvG could be in this game with Stronghold mode. Since that one was a huge fail, i don't believe GvG would be better frankly..Hall of heroes could be interesting. The GW1 format with ghostly hero wouldn't be good because of the condition overload.

However if we made it like :

• After 5 consecutive wins in solo queue , teams are awaiting for a match against holding team. Note that potentially teams can skip directly to face the holding team
• Winning team becomes holding team, which gives an advantage to guild members, more rating points, and one exclusive chest

This would require very few development, be good at making top players play and rewarding them. But i believe this should have come a few years ago, it might be too late now..

[Nash.3974]

I voted yes because I desperately want new game modes. Though this won’t work that you have pay to unlock a pvp mode. I would pay to support them working on a new mode but not to unlock it. It’s impossible to lock out players of a mode who can’t/don’t want to pay for it.

[Dami.5046]

I'd rather have JQ/FA back TBH.

[ChronosCosmos.9450]

@Nash.3974 said:I voted yes because I desperately want new game modes. Though this won’t work that you have pay to unlock a pvp mode. I would pay to support them working on a new mode but not to unlock it. It’s impossible to lock out players of a mode who can’t/don’t want to pay for it.

Same lol. I really hope that Anet sees the demand in new PvP modes with some kind of ladder.

[Lincolnbeard.1735]

Voted no, not because I won't like it but because I can't see how it would work.If the reason you're interested in GvG is to be similar to GW1: long fights at flag stand trying to push each others, splitting to gank enemy base or to defend your base, flag runner running flags, it simply won't be there, GW2 combat system won't allow that.Like Abazigal said, ANet tried it with Stronghold, it didn't work.

[alcopaul.2156]

The Other Mode is GvG.

What do you do in GW1 GvG? Get Morale Boosts from Flag, Fight, Break the Gate, Kill the Lord.

Strong Hold? Get Door Breakers, Fight, Summon Champions, Kill The Lord.

[Kraitan.8476]

Ill play €20-30 easily for any non conquest teambased pvp mode with a large map preferably