Jump to content
  • Sign Up

World Restructuring Update 1

Recommended Posts

  • ArenaNet Staff

July 2018 Update

I have been meaning to give everyone a World Restructuring update for a while now and I finally have a bit of down time to spend doing just that. Back in January, we posted a tentative design that would balance world populations and allow for continued balancing as time goes on. Since that post, we have reviewed a lot of community feedback in many forms (Gw2 Official Forum discussions, Reddit, in game interactions, etc.) and have started moving forward with that system. As we stated in the original document, this large task requires work from multiple disciplines and is going to take some time to fully complete. Add to that live game support and, as you can guess, our task lists are full.


At this time, we do not have a date to share with the community but we are actively working toward internal milestones. We plan to post periodic updates when we have interesting or relevant information to share.

Where are they now?

We currently have in place some of the backend systems that will track, store, and handle changes to the alliance structure of guilds. The current iteration does not include front-end systems or UI for creating, joining, or otherwise dealing with alliances. However, it gives us some structure and the ability to start field-testing how alliances/WvW guilds would look. From here, we can run simulations and get a sense for how the system might function under load.

What is next?

The next major things to develop are the front-end systems and the back-end matchmaking. The front-end takes time and iteration, and the matchmaking itself is sort of the whole point and needs to be undertaken with care, since it involves assigning every WvW player to a new world all at once!

Why is this taking so long?

This project is not small in scale. As we said when we began, we are changing and adding a bunch of major systems with this change. We are moving along at a pace that tracks with our goals but, as is the nature of our jobs, things can come up involving either unforeseen complications with the World Restructuring system or issues with the live game that need to be addressed first.

Updates, Clarifications and FAQ

What makes up a world?

We will build a world from any number of Alliances, Guilds, and Solo Players. This means a single alliance will not necessarily dominate the population of a world. The goal is to create even worlds, so the matchmaker builds the worlds out of whatever pieces makes sense to fulfill that goal.

Will you build hard-core and casual worlds?

No. The goal is to balance worlds by population. The matchmaker, at this time, is unconcerned with trying to match skill.

Alliance size

We are currently leaning toward alliance size being 500. This is technically easier, as we already support groups of this size (guilds), and it gives us more flexibility to make the worlds even.

Minimum Guild Size

The original plan was to count a guild within the alliance at some rounded-up size rather than exact size when calculating how full an alliance was. The benefit of this method was it would give more autonomy to the individual guilds to control WvW members, i.e., recruit new members or if current guild members decide they want to start playing WvW.


If—and that is a big if—we do add/change rewards to be tied more directly to World success in matches, those changes would come later. The plan is to ship the core system and get all the kinks worked out and the teams balanced before we start trying to find new ways to give rewards or do tournaments or anything of that kind.

Player Play Hours

In the original post and discussion, we talked about using player hours (the current method we use for calculating world sizes for links and “full” status) and then adjusting those hours by other metrics like command hours, etc. We subsequently have decided to, at least at the start, use only play hours and not adjust using other metrics. This will allow us to compare apples to apples so to speak once the system is in place. From there we can simulate how certain adjustments would change the matchups. This will make it easier to determine if an adjustment will have a positive impact.

Alliance Tags on the Name Plate

As of right now, changes to the nameplate that add an Alliance Tag is in the “Would Like to Have” column.

How is the alliance system going to affect queues?

It depends on where you normally play. If you are used to playing on a large world then I imagine the queue times will seem better. If you are used to playing on a smaller world then the queue times may seem to increase somewhat. This also is dependent on how big we let the worlds get. We can potentially adjust the number of worlds to help with this.

Alliance Chat

This is something we have on our list. With the exception of a technical limitation that prevents us from doing it this, we believe it should be something that gets in eventually.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 328
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • ArenaNet Staff

@"ImperialWL.7138" said:When you say "player hours" am I right in assuming this is strictly WvW playtime and not overall account playtime? It may seem obvious but you didn't clarify it. Just want to make sure that it is actually WvW playtime.

Yes WvW play time

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are more than 500 roleplayers. Joining an alliance won't work for the community. No, people don't RP in the WvW maps, but server DOES matter for which map instance/IP address you get put into if all other factors are equal. It matters, and hopefully it's still being taken into consideration.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@ImperialWL.7138 said:

@GDchiaScrub.3241 said:So. What happens to the RPer's and their server(s)?


Do people really RP in WvW?

Judging from the amount of RP posts you see on a daily basis, way more than there should be (if you need a reminder go to red borderland).

Why is that even a thing? It's a PvP mode... that's a way to get killed in your RP session.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your home server is currently a significant factor in which PvE map instances you are put into by default. It's not the only factor, but it is something that noticeably makes a difference.

If home worlds as they exist today are being replaced by alliances, is part of the intended design that your alliance will become a factor that influences PvE instance selection? If not, are there plans for how this process will be modified to account for home worlds no longer existing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Rysdude.3824 said:

@"GDchiaScrub.3241" said:So. What happens to the RPer's and their server(s)?


Do people really RP in WvW?

You mean you don't re-create war tactics and have a bunch of warriors and deadeyes kneeling and taking turns firing at eachother ?

Whatever that means, but no. Lol

Just as a quick example.....also it was largely a joke.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If an alliance has a cap of 500 players, will there be a cap to how many alliances can be in a world?What will be the total world population cap?How will transferring work since populations will be reshuffled every 2 months, the current system will need to be changed.Do we still need to mark a guild/alliance to stay on the same world?Will there still be a cap to how many guilds can be in an alliances, if so what is it?Will there be changes to guilds to allow more flexibility for players? Increasing the number of guild slots so people can join a guild specifically for WvW and mark it for example.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Create New...