EU bottom three servers

[aspirine.5839]

Hi Anet, can you please take a look at these servers? It's not a matchup topic perse, but these 3 servers almost have no population anymore. Feels like a bit of a shame since at least one of them was a very good one in the past. Rather see one tier less than to fight empty servers again.

[Dawdler.8521]

Problem is the rule of nationality servers being linked to their own. If you delete a tier, you can only link those 3 servers to the other 2 german servers, which will most likely lead to an oppressivly strong server with 2 links no matter how you look at it. Keep in mind that the french servers which already has a similar setup is less populated overall - 3 out of 5 are medium. For the german side, 1 out 7 is medium. (If the wiki is updated, havent checked ingame)

[Illconceived Was Na.9781]

@"Dawdler.8521" said:(If the wiki is updated, havent checked ingame)Wiki uses the same API that shows the status in the game, i.e. they should be consistent with each other.

Keep in mind that the "Full" status isn't 100% automatic. ANet can (and does) label a world "Full" even if it's lower in population than other "High" pop worlds, in order to prevent migration.

[Jethro.9376]

Just don't bother until alliances hit the servers.

[Dawdler.8521]

@Illconceived Was Na.9781 said:

@"Dawdler.8521" said:(If the wiki is updated, havent checked ingame)Wiki uses the same API that shows the status in the game, i.e. they should be consistent with each other.

Keep in mind that the "Full" status isn't 100% automatic. ANet can (and does) label a world "Full" even if it's lower in population than other "High" pop worlds, in order to prevent migration.Perhaps, but somehow I doubt they do it for the lowest tier single servers.

Either way the point is that it's an unfixable problem unless we allow national server to link with international ones.

[CrimsonRise.7650]

Yeah underworld/fsp could do with a manual adjustment..

[Miko.4158]

up or down? uw/fsp is set to go upcheaper?already alot of guilds 'touring' the lower tiersthe answer is alliance

[Illconceived Was Na.9781]

@Dawdler.8521 said:

@Illconceived Was Na.9781 said:

@Dawdler.8521 said:(If the wiki is updated, havent checked ingame)Wiki uses the same API that shows the status in the game, i.e. they should be consistent with each other.

Keep in mind that the "Full" status isn't 100% automatic. ANet can (and does) label a world "Full" even if it's lower in population than other "High" pop worlds, in order to prevent migration.Perhaps, but somehow I doubt they do it for the lowest tier single servers.

I'm sorry I didn't make my point clear: you don't have to check in-game; the wiki will always be up to date.I was not addressing the issue the OP's suggestion of whether there are too many EU worlds, which is why I only replied to the technical part of your previous post.

@Dawdler.8521 said:Either way the point is that it's an unfixable problem unless we allow national server to link with international ones.Another technical note: every world is "international;" not a single one is based on a "nation." Some EU servers are language specific, which is maybe what you meant.

---

Again, to be clear, I'm not taking a position on the OP's suggestion.

[CrimsonRise.7650]

@Miko.4158 said:up or down? uw/fsp is set to go upcheaper?already alot of guilds 'touring' the lower tiersthe answer is alliance

It looks like they aren't going to climb to 1 that easily though, so I guess RoF will be the new bandwagon link in T1, as it's still only medium pop.

This week is already really boring, but I guess someone has to get perma stuck in T1 again.