LightningWolfTigerBear.672 Posted October 23, 2017 Share Posted October 23, 2017 @dusanyu.4057 said:We need less human discoballs not make more by making it Easter to create them.stoplikingwhatIdontlike.jpeg comes to mind.@DakotaCoty.5721 said:so everyone can afford it.You say that like it's a bad thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LightningWolfTigerBear.672 Posted October 23, 2017 Share Posted October 23, 2017 @DakotaCoty.5721 said:@Ayakaru.6583 said:@DakotaCoty.5721 said:@Ayakaru.6583 said:"That no one is talking about" 《 redirect yourself to my nightfury conundrum topic, several topics on the old forum and more fire on reddit that Balthazar had ever seen. On a serious, this is a very relevant topic, and i always encourage to bring it up when they can. I skim read a lot of the "PLEASE GIVE AURA WARDROBE" threads, and most of the high-profile ones completely neglect the impact that such a treatment could have on the economy, I do apologise if I missed it in one of the initial posts, but it seems everyone wants a system like this and not really thinking of then negative impact a poorly-implemented system added could have.Titled amended accordingly...But you're right, i skimmed a little to fast,I thought you were advocating the wardrobe, but you're opposing it. Because, if i get your stance right, the value would drop if people couldn't stack them.But i personally have one suggestion:An aura slot next to the armour slots. That way they can wear 6 auras at once.The wardrobe is by itself not a bad idea, but requires good implementation.But i have two issues, firstly, are there that many overly rich people? And secondly, is it so bad if the value of auras dropped?I mean.. the only people for whom it would be bad if the price dropped, would be TP flippers, right?People who aim to look expensive by investing into these infusions / auras / armor skins / weapon skins spend a great deal of time acquiring that gold, so why should they lose out just because people want a wardrobe?So your biggest concern with such a change is losing your status symbols? I don't think you're going to find much, if any, sympathy for your plight bud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OriOri.8724 Posted October 23, 2017 Share Posted October 23, 2017 A - I don't see how this is a problem. There are other ways to show people you have more money in game than you know what to do with.B - There is nothing saying that an aura wardrobe has to limit us to fewer auras than we can currently use. It could be something along the lines of offering an aura slot for each equipment spot, which would make this a non-issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khisanth.2948 Posted October 23, 2017 Share Posted October 23, 2017 It could be a problem but it also doesn't have to be.Why must they be mutually exclusive? An aura wardrobe could just be an additional system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ardid.7203 Posted October 23, 2017 Share Posted October 23, 2017 If auras were on the wardrobe I could maybe actually care about them...IMO wardrobe is suposed to show what alternatives are there. The staking thing is something the devs must define, it doesn´t have to be somehow ended by the wardrobe implementation. If they determine people can stack only 1 auras, ok, thats the limit. If they determine people can stack 20, ok too. The visualization and storage of the auras doesn't have anything to do whit the stacking limit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.