[Warclaw Annoyance]

@jwaz.1908 said:Anyone else find it annoying that after leaving WvW, the Warclaw is set to your active mount in PvE also? I'm not sure if this is a bug or just a design flaw, but either way it's inconvenient to have to switch back every time you enter/leave WvW.

It doesn't bother me at all because I have a handy little keyboard that has extra buttons down one side. They are called macro buttons but I call them my mount buttons. Each mount has their own. Makes mounting and unmounting a lot easier.

[Is the Warclaw just a reskinned Griffon?]

@"Rubi Bayer.8493" said:"Reskinned" isn't quite right, but you're on the right track in that it's the same rig! We did talk some about it on last week's Guild Chat, but if you want a more in-depth discussion on the topic, we did a Guild Chat back in 2016 with one of our Game Designers and one of our Animators about creature design. We get into a conversation about building creatures from existing rigs

. Ben uses behind the scenes footage of some existing in-game creatures to explain why it's done this way.

I remember this. You showed that you used the "frame" for a Quaggan to make the Bristleback. It was actually kind of cool to see how it was done.

[What is your favorite Mount/Mount skin and why? How can they improve?]

The main thing that I want is a different way to distribute them. Stop putting skins for 5 different mounts in one pack. Make it so that each pack is for one mount. A pack of Raptor skins, a pack of Springer skins, you get the picture. I would be way more likely to purchase them if it was done this way. As it is I am not going to buy the current pack and end up with skins that I either don't want or for a mount that I hardly ever use.

If they did this, made each pack for a particular mount, I honestly think that more players would be willing to purchase them.