Jump to content
  • Sign Up

Malos.5723

Members
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Malos.5723

  1. 2 hours ago, Kodama.6453 said:

    Great, then play turret engineer.

    Engineer already has the AI gameplay, we don't need a second set for this.

     

    Additionally, golemancer is pretty lame thematically. It doesn't bring anything new to the table when it comes to lore, since we knew golemancer all the way back to GW1.

     

    Flavourwise, it also doubles up on the Asuran aesthetics. We already have holosmith for the Asuran tech elite spec.

     

    I personally would enjoy more if we could look into the alchemy theme of engineer more. Plaguedoctor would be my dream elite spec for engineer.

    turrets are stationary and were nerfed to oblivion because people kept complaining about them
    personally I'd rather have steam creatures then golems
    there's already an alchemy traitline for engineer and imo plaguedoctor sounds more like a necro elite

  2. 2 hours ago, Lazze.9870 said:

     

    Doesn't mean it's not junk either. It just means some dislike it while others ignore the flaws of it. Because they do have flaws.

     

    The ranger pet is the most flawed and inconsistent mechanic in the game. Hinders dps in pve (hence permamerged soulbeast) and is useless for larger teamfights in competetive modes. In 1v1s can be anything from chasing a target with little reward to suddenly landing a high burst attack to someone not paying attention and turning the entire fight in favor of the ranger. Smokescale being the outlier because it has an easier time sticking to a target.

     

    I don't think anyone that dwells into competetive modes want to deal with more AI. I also assume that most people who want more AI based spec are leaning towards the casual pve side (not meant as an offense in any way).

     

    Which leads me too this; yes for hammer and wells on ranger (although I want the hammer to be pure power), hopefully with a more consistent twist on the mechanic than what core ranger and druid get so that ranger can compete for roles it currently can't do (pvp/wvw).

    i know ai classes have flaws, ive played tons of them. i also know how funny it is when a "bad ai class" is top/close to top dps in pvp and raids in other games when its decent enough. 

  3. 38 minutes ago, MrForz.1953 said:

     

    Yes. More AI. Because ranger pets are exemplary. No seriously, you make it seem like you actually hate the class. What's wrong with people pushing that junk lately?

    Maybe because some people actually like AI classes, myself included and want more options. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean its junk

    • Like 2
    • Confused 2
×
×
  • Create New...