Jump to content
  • Sign Up

Undertaker.4368

Members
  • Posts

    155
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Undertaker.4368

  1. On 2/11/2022 at 2:53 AM, Gundam Style.8495 said:

    You simply can not reward losers or losing. It does not build character or competitive spirit. It does not matter if mcskeevey doesnt want his time wasted. His time needs to be useless when he loses, so his gain will be knowledge and improvment and desire to lose less. Awarding anything for a loss is why most people fail, even in life. You have to hold people accountable. They might feel uncomfortable, but it will cause growth. Why do you think that nothing you tried worked? No balancing worked? Nothing worked? Because you rewarded bots, afkers, and quitters. This is why the mode failed, 100%. Some will say e-sports, or no development, but rewarding losers is why the mode failed. You must, absolutely must, reward only winning. Actually, rating loss should be even more stronger for losses. Also, the average player is not gold, so the soft reset should not be (rating +1200)/2...it should be rating previous season, and you get what you got after 1o placements with the same volatility. Players should more frequently end up in low silver and bronze. They are that terrible. The climb should be difficult for everyone, and no more duo q, at least not with anyone far from your own rating. This mode needs to be stricter, as is, it is a joke.

    5 years here  dude/girl  and problmes with not givg awars is a funny.  during this 5 years no matter wjht how much you try  there ALWAYS happen loits in row, bots.  I was at gold but i fall at silver 3  because stuffs happen and what?   Maybe we should  banish people in same situation . What about you? maybe show us you never got bad matches?  Because problem is bigger than few stupid rewards. Problems are people

×
×
  • Create New...