[Goodwill gesture to stop drama - Give those who bought bag slots a few equipment templates, for free]

@Pirogen.9561 said:

@"mindcircus.1506" said:I see we're in the bargaining phase now....

I think this was the case from the start.

People always, especialy those that are the loudest, have "motives", "agendas". And its usualy "price".

I believe mindcircus is referring to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%BCbler-Ross_model

[So we wanted a charr motorcycle, we got an armadillo...]

@Mepheles.2087 said:We already have airships,tanks and submarines but apparently for everyone motorcycles break their immersion. Also games like Gw2, FFXIV and WoW are not traditional fantasy. They are high fantasy/steampunk fantasy to some extent. FFXIV is having this discussion too because they are introducing clouds bike from Advent Children into the game now. It feels like the glass that holds most people's immersion is way too easily shattered.

The problem with having motorcycles is, if they are popular and I imagine they would be, they would be everywhere unlike the airships etc.

[Still no bikini or "speedo"?]

@Blocki.4931 said:

@sorudo.9054 said:

@"Super Hayes.6890" said:Just no. I hope this request never gains traction with the devs. For every player that actually wants this for cosmetic preferences there will be ten others that use it in an offensive way. There are already outfits and armors that are "seductive" enough. The game absolutely does not need bikinis and speedos.

if you can find me any clothing that is even remotely "seductive"in this game i applaud you.

There are a few pretty sexy ones.

Flamekissed armor for example shows A LOT of skin. Human cultural tier 3 light armor is known as THE boob top in the game..

There are a few more but sadly I don't know the names of the armor sets or outfits.

Sexy doesn't always / doesn't have to mean showing a lot of skin.

[How tall is too tall for a Charr]

51 degrees (assuming centigrade) isn't that hot, I wouldn't worry about it.

[Were are ANET servers located??]

Okay, I am not questioning that CAT7 is technically better than CAT5e, but if your internet connection is only (for example) 100Mb and the Ethernet cable only goes for lets say 5 feet from the modem to the computer, how is CAT7 practically any better than CAT5e (you are nowhere near the capability of the CAT7 cable and well within the capability of the CAT5e and over 5 feet there should be no real interference that needs special shielding). And since I am not any sort of engineer, please refrain from all the technical jargon use.