Jump to content
  • Sign Up

DEMONT.5804

Members
  • Posts

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

DEMONT.5804's Achievements

  1. You got to be kidding me. Are people really crying about a game spec that can be voided by a block? I dont even play thief in pvp but apparently some people cant handle getting rekt by one? I dont think any change is gonna do any good, people will still cry for no reason. Here is some advice : Keep getting rekt by a thief? TRY WARRIOR ! Warrior rampage will slaughter a thief, so now in that case we should look forward to warriors rampage being taken away huh, LOL. I think this entire issue is a waste of the staff time as they should be working on things that actually matter. Tip of the Day: Stop crying and try something diff to counter your crying issues.. LIKE WARRIOR? Just a note from someone who couldnt care less about thief sense they dont rekt me. Dont botther replying, I wont see it sense i rarly touch these forums- for this reason, yall need to grow up and learn how to adapt.
  2. Well there is a pro and con to everything regardless, but- even though this is only a suggested template- i never expect anything to come from them or if they do in any form, so far down the road that most of us would have another time filler anyways. As for the "if one leaves form one side" statement, thats a good question, they would have fillable spots, but no one would get kicked because of that as (every night) at least after reset, most maps get filled in minutes, so the numbers are not the issue, its the toxic 20v2/5 that cause people to not want to go and trying to keep them there or have more come, even if only an hour or two a night/day w/e time. Now as for the server mention, this is Huge as an issue, having diff sides is great, thats a no brainer, but there isnt a need for "diff instances/maps" in the game anyways, that should be removed from at least some content. have 1 instance for wvw active Only, until it gets full, then have another one go active, this 2/3/5 instances at the same time is also one of the larger problems that some fights are 20v1/2 . As i said, just a template suggestion to have ppl consider things and work out better versions, but i never expect any good from them.
  3. I agree 100%, though its not advertised as 11mill sold, its advertised as 11mill players, but you are right on all of that.
  4. Theres always a price to pay, You in partocular want you and your guild to dominate without a fair fight. That makes you unfair and a disadvantage to wvw. As much as i "like that idea" it Isnt fair by any means. Let them drip in 1 by 1, as of thsi comment, 70 ppl have read this forum, thats 20 a side easy, so ""you and your friends" would have already been in together,,,,,, correction, 100 ppl have this already and thats Not bad numbers for all 3 sides, 25/25/25, fair and simple where no one can Troll wvw and cause people to not want to go be apart of that content. Also- consider the other suggestion about "Guilds vs Guilds" where you would have that feature for your entire guild to go at 1 time against another guild or 2 . That balances out the need to hit a random content - wvw- where anyone cna que in and just go for the guild content.
  5. Actually you are entirly wrong there, as long as they click to register to enter and get a match, they can meet up wit their guildies, friends and ect. And thus ofc would be discord for all those that got in. Not sure you actually read what I wrote. There is no Good reason in any content wiht player v player mode for a need of 20v1 or 20v5. If by chance one side is unorganized or just doesnt care and gets outnumbered as such, thats their fault, but the game mode would be equal and fair, Thats whats important, but you said that as if you are one of those 20v1 or i aint doing it types, and i may be wrong, but thats how it sounds as i would love 20v1 any day of the week, in fact seen it to my benefit more than a few times, but doesnt mean its fair. My "idea" would make the content fair regardless of friends, guilds, discord But still give that a feature as long as those people register for a match to enter and Be with their reg player buddies. Not opposed to that, only the unfairness that should be corrected.
  6. Possibly the special loots form the metas or the guild community war events, i believe will bring pve'rs into that content a bit more but not to the point they hate it more as some pve'rs i know just do not do that content. Also maybe if anet adds a "did 1 hour wvw, get a temp pve skill for 1 hour or equal time to that u spend in wvw, like maybe an added acct wide 25% dmg reduction in pve? or "dbl" loot drop in pve? just a new thought to a benefit for those non wvw'rs to at least come sometimes.
  7. I think, and only an opinion, the suggested metas? and knowing each side is equal in numbers, would bring more from pve- for those events, such as the suggested guild war event. And its a weekly? event, so wouldnt take the pve'rs from their fav content non stop, plenty time to do both or more.
  8. If its based on register (which should by all means be just as fast if not faster than current Que's in game) with a claim of 11mill playing, each side should have an easy 20 within minutes. And the way im thinking the structure like this, no server should be able to Tank. appreciate the feedback, a good argument always helps to see other options.
  9. As I am sure those groups that only want to 20v1 a play will not like this, there IS a fix for WvW to bring more people in and keep more people in longer. "WvW Registry" Which is simply where each side has no more than 1 player more than any other side. For example, Red clicks Register to Enter, and as that 1 person enters, another color can register a player to enter to match, and thus so for the next color. It can be done a few different ways, where as when each side has 1 person Registered to play "that map" all 3 will the enter, and so on until the map is full AND Equally Fair for all 3 sides. There wouldn't be anymore 20v1 just because there isn't enough players, there Would however still be 20v1 if a side doesn't coordinate, which would be their fault, not the WvW Content and would have no reason to Troll chat and Content with. I have seen So many days of 20/30/50 v 1/2/5/10 and So many people leave WvW because the numbers are Bad that the Content is almost void, we can bring it back and back with a vengeance. As my 1st post and I couldn't care about the spelling errors, ive been up 40 hours working this out in my head, I am sure some of this could have been worded differently or explained better and I am 100% sure those that Only live on 20v1 will complain about this, it is the ONLY real solution I see to keep longer more playable players in WvW. While I am at it, I would also love to see some WvW content added, such as, killing Enemy color creatures giving WXP, even WvW Boss Metas, such as Mini Jormag or Mini Teq, as examples, the color that gets the Boss kill gets drop chest with extra special loots. Just an Idea. On the same but Diff note: This is called "Guild Wars" yet there isn't any "guild wars" content. Makes No sense but might suggest a map similar to WvW, would be larger with a possible 5/10/20?? Colors? Each guild has to have a certain number to be able to register against other guilds in the map, such as 10 or 25? Once a guild has a competitor registered, and can be multiple guilds or a set event each week?? The guilds will enter and battle "such as WvW" for a main castle, which the winner will be able to keep for a week as the occupiers. The Castle occupiers have for that week, or any week they are in possession of the castle, a special skill set ( like that in Djinns pvp arena) which is usable in all game content/modes. I have no clue if I just wasted my time and effort to make a game I like better from what I see, but Hey, one can hope? With a claim of 11 million player base, and with the fact visuals of what a lot of us see in a lot of content, I believe this will help and push some gamer hobbyists to new levels of "want" to do more and more rather than, :This sucks, IM done" "This is broke, not doing it" Ect. Welp, any feedback or acknowledgement from Arenanet that something of this nature is in the works?? would be massively appreciated. And again, Ive been up 40 some odd hours thinking on this, so spelling error heaven it Is.
×
×
  • Create New...