Eon of Aeon.4658

I mean those are all stock speeds though, and entirely ignoring my main point;How can an OC of nearly 1 Ghz more....give me little to no improvement in FPS? Are you telling me the coding in the game and/or the architecture in my newer CPU is so utterly garbage, that despite nearly a 20%~ or so increase in clock speed....I'm getting NO performance improvements?!

I nowadays have 16 GB of DDR3 ram at 1800 or 1866 speed,A FX-6300 overclocked to 4.2 or 4.4 GHz with 6 cores,a SSD OS hard drive with relatively fast HDDs for GW2 n other programs/games,a 4GB model 960 GTX. Before this, I had a 2 GB GPU that I forget the name of,a 1090T 6 core overclocked to 3.6,and 8 gb of 1333 DDR3 ram with no SSD n a few slower HDDs. Yet I don't feel any significant improvement to FPS in cities/world bosses compared to before (and PoF is just as bad for most zones) them. And I'm apparently being outperformed by a 4 year old laptop, because someone in cliffs told me he was on a 4 year old laptop running a 2.4 Ghz 4 core with MAX settings at 30-40 FPS....yet with my current specs at the top, in populated areas like the Cliffs, I only get 30s-low 40s if I have everything on MINIMUM... Call me crazy, but I feel like a jump of nearly 1 Ghz should make SOME notable improvement in FPS since core count/ram/gpu doesn't....I feel like with those specs, I should not be running bare minimum gfx just to get more than 11-17 FPS in non dead zones :V