Jump to content
  • Sign Up

youle.5824

Members
  • Posts

    182
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by youle.5824

  1. 18 hours ago, anduriell.6280 said:

    Out of curiosity, Are you playing in NA for a chance?  I mean NA players have a funny concept for "one-shot".

    I've seen that azzar dude once, main thief if I'm not mistaken and  lately having a  bad time trying in PvP with the ranger. To be expected with that weird build with trapper runes and power setup. And no "one-shot" to be seen anywhere. 

    Nothing you said makes any sense. Ranger got the side node build with Axe and the pewpew sicem for noobstomping. That's all, Anet quickly nerfed the decap druid as soon as it showed any potential. Funny balance team doing funny stuff. 

     

    I played few years on EU then few years on NA, and one shot was refered as well since early in game for the like of mes core burst that 'one shotted' people , term was used on both NA and EU and still is. So refering to one shot for <1 sec burst from slb that downs even 30k HP NEC's is valid fyi. And the druid build I was talking about isn't the decap build but the one boyce used often on stream, tried it too and it's 'okay' not op but more then enough for plat 1 . 

  2. To the people that said ranger can't carry solo q I highly disagree and got experience playing differents build in plat 2 solo q with ranger, which isnt my main class but carried me hard. Azzar also uses one shot sic en in plat 3 solo q often on Twitch. 

    Here is a list in order of how much carry you can do with ranger builds 'imo'.

    1. Sic en axe w/h Lb one shot. Top carry cause you can literally farm all the other team by yourself even if you have 4 silvers with you and you play vs 5 plats. But takes way more skill and map knowledge. No stunbreak and defense at all. It's all about positioning , respawn awareness etc..

    2. Core ranger , either lb gs zerk or the Valkyrie axe dagger Gs meta , both are amazing side noder and if played well the only counter is ele with shield skilll. But you can still win if you outskill him  .

    3. Condi soupbeast. Viable but has counters so not in all games. Eurantien using it sometimes in high plat to counter holos I think. Don't use it personally so can't say much about it.

    4. Zerk druid staff gs with BM and MM , build used by Boyce that I had fun in plat 1 plat2 . Not crazy carry but definitely viable. Until people learn to avoid your burst, which if you spam q all day they will eventually.

    And a few others not as good but still smh viable in plat 1 and lower like condi trap druid or core and the like...

  3. @Baest.4061 said:but with that build u dont stack 25 might. It was Always a 1 vs 1 so he couldn't get boons from othersand can u stack 25 vuln in like 3 seconds?

    ... Every one that knows how to play nades can cap 25 might on it, without outside help.

  4. @Psycoprophet.8107 said:Guys cmon gw2 is not that great of a mmo, its combat mechanics are good for pvp, but the rest? Lol why are u still subjecting urself to such garbage gaming experience when there's so many better games/experiences out there. Teach the devs a lesson and drop the meme game.

    I have tried most and none can compare to GW2 , BNS PvP was the closest to descent action combat PvP but the situation is way worse over there..

  5. @Rukia.4802 said:

    @youle.5824 said:100b mobile is wrong place to buff and is more likely to bring brainless gameplay...

    Regardless in an action combat game being stuck in place for an attack feels awful, HB isn't the only skill that suffers from this.

    Action combat doesn't mean you have to be mobile at all time... And since HB isnt mobile you need to CC first which is the basic of smart gameplay otherwise it would just be dps vs dps or vs heal heal..

  6. Sad to say condi thief does it better then power but go on it and you will see the 'walls' melt in seconds. Or throw grenade barrage with zerk holo on mid fight and you might laugh at result.. or cry. If they have tempest power rev will do the job just fine still.. ez burst there. Zerk slb lb 5 on mid from 1500 range will wipe them all if you go full glass. Lr rod ele can still combo 20 k dmg in 2 sec with right combo dagger focus ofc. Did i forget reaper?

  7. Exactly what aelska.4609 said. Explosive entrance needs a nerf (most people even the one playing it will agree on that, I play it too) and I also loved ranger dodge on auto, added depth to skill play.. BUT and HUGE BUT do you think ranger gs right now needs to be stronger. Its one if not the strongest weapon set in the game for current meta. 2 cc.. already above average in less stab meta. Gs 3 evade still amazing. Maul still do rly nice dmg with awesome synergy with MM and BM traits to proc big numbers. And ofc still descent cd on op block. No wonder bunker pick this offensive weapon compare staff to it you ll laugh im sure.

  8. To the people wondering if explosive entrance need a nerf, wonder this, any casual attack after dodge will hit harder then zerk backstab for thief. And you can spam it twice because who care double dodge if your opponents is dead after right ^^ dont nerf holo its explosive entrance that does too much. If you nerf holo next meta will be scrapper grenade explosive..

  9. To the few claiming that sitting in cart is an exploit, if you hadnt noticed on most nodes theres a spot you can stand where knockback wont push you off node. 80% of the nodes have this and its very much intended as a counterplay by using environement, which is a big part of gw2 pvp.

  10. @"JTGuevara.9018" said:I like this 3v3 idea! Still, I wonder if you all will keep catering to the 1 % of the community who's still obsessed with conquest and just take a risk and gives us a full tdm season, whether 2v2 or 3v3. Something fresh!

    And also, when are you all going to blow up this matchmaking system? I'm sorry but it is atrocious. I take a break from ranked for a couple of years because of the then sorry state of pvp only to be placed in silver?....Even though I played for years and consistently and historically placed in gold2- gold3....I'm sorry but that's propostrous. I have to grind matches just to get to the point where I previously was, just because the system "thinks" I belong there? Yeah...no...that is not a good system. I don't care who tells me otherwise.

    Yeah, I don't believe in the ideology of "skill-based matchmaking". I have to constantly grind matches and not take breaks just to maintain rank? Yeah...no...

    Spoken like a true casual... you just took a break for a couple years of ranked and expect the same ranking lol..

×
×
  • Create New...