Lost Dragons Tail.3760

Thanks Shadowcatz I didn't realize it was an event. That helps tremendously.

How am I suppose to get this achievement, comrades in arms, when there is no champions? I have looked all over the area they say and even the suggestion on wiki and there is no champions in the area. What am I missing. Or am I destined to never get it because I play when the maps are not packed to cause champions?

at it is missing the dot in last link to your site guildwars'.'com

since the last update all I'm doing is resetting. it is randomly resetting me to a beginning part of my character when I loaded them.

Why is it easier to kill one of the destroyers in public then in personal instance? And then when you choose even just one challenge they don't seem to even take damage for some time? I attacked the same type of destroying in a public instance and it melted. But when I did the instance as a personal one previously, it took me about three times as long to kill the thing.I then decided to go in and see what it is like to do the challenge mote to get the shooting star mp. After trying once with all challenges up and not even coming close to finishing, let a lone get the mp, I decided to just do one challenge and again pretty much insanely hard. Have you all decide that we don't need the mp's now? Because from my point of view that is what you are trying to imply. With even discounting it is impossible for me to get that one mp in the new episode, you have put mp's behind map wide meta's in maps that I have as yet seen been done since the next episode comes out. So some of my masteries I have simply not gotten. And then the masteries we just get seem to be so I can buy things just so I can get more mp to buy more things. I am a bit confused as to the direction of where all this is going.P.S. and this is just a comment for those that might comment. Since there is no way to get an email or some kind of notification I can't promise I will even remember to come back and read later when the comments are finally posted online.

Then yes I misunderstood what was being said. I guess I got lost in the side comments to the point I lost the root discussion. But in my defense I am known in person by many as lost. Granted the name was from my my nick I used for the longest time on the net but it does fit me personally.And I personally can't remember the atmosphere of gw1 since it has been years since I played it so I will leave the conversation saying "Sorry me bad" As an aside, honestly never pay much attention to the atmosphere of a game so I will have to take your all's word on that. But to an extent I will say from what I do remember of the missions and the general story of gw1, gw2 is kind of all over the place unlike gw1 where I could follow the story smoothly, or at least easier.

Not sure why you are asking me to point out things I said aren't there. I said in my last post that they were advertised in that clip as different. Maybe you should reread what I typed in my last response. So why are you asking me to show something I never said there was. And as I said the statement 'all the things you loved' is a marketing phrase and says nothing of what will be in gw2. As for the manifesto, give me a link to where it is and then I will personally see what it actually says. As I said I can only go by what I remember and that was a long time ago.I am not here trying to say what is similar or dissimilar. AGAIN I want PROOF of where they said that things in gw2 will be the same as in gw1.

I watched that when it first came out and I watched it again, but it did not say it is going to be like gw1. They said it is going to have the things you like about gw1. Now yes I understand that each person has their parts that they love the most. And they will think that anet was referring to something they personally think should be in gw2, but realistically that is impossible since anet can't know what each individual person loves about gw1. I do agree it is a shoddy way of saying it that can be interpreted in many different ways by many different people, but just by watching that clip one can surmise that it was nothing like gw1. Well I guess I should say some, like me, surmise it will be nothing like gw1 in how it is played. But it still does not prove that anet said gw1 was going to be a gw2 cloneish. Even in the clip they said it is like nothing you have ever seen before, so thus they are implying that it can't be like gw1 since we have seen it before.I will say there are things I loved about gw1 that I wish were in gw2 and vice versa, but I by no means believed that it is possible to make a semi mmo into a full mmo without having some compromises. I still think fondly back on gw1 and yes in some ways like the op I do miss many things about gw1, but honestly I personally don't want to go back to gw1 since it looses a lot of what I love about gw2.My post was simply to say that without proof one cannot say that anet promised anything, and they didn't. 'What you love about gw1' is subjective and honestly just a marketing tool since just about every game does the same type of wording. That does not give proof that anet promised that gw2 will be like gw1 but in the future. Now I do agree that yes it can be interpreted just as you did. I do see that and I agree that it was a crappy way of saying it to just get the gw1 players to buy and try it out. But in the end I was looking for proof of what anet says and they never say in clear terms that it is going to be like gw1 but based on what that clip says it says it will be nothing like anything you have seen before.

I want to chime in here. I played gw1 and waited in anticipation for gw2, but no where in any of their statements did they say that gw2 was going to be like gw1. They made it clear multiple times, from what I remember, that it was going to be a different experience, but with some of the professions and lore. I heard it said and told that it was 250 years in the future and things have changed.But by all means if you can find proof on the net where anet, not people on forums or similar places, said that it was going to be like gw1 then please post them. Because simply saying that it is so does not make is so. Just like many things in gw2 where someone will state that anet promised something, but was never able to provide proof and then another provides proof they said it differently.When gw2 came out I at first thought this is not gw. But I kept with it and eventually learned the game. Now I have tried multiple times to play gw1 and just can't do it. I feel stifled in combat because I can't move, or I can't jump. But each persons memory will vary. And one thing I have learned over time is that most people will only remember the good things and ignore or forget the things they don't like. But how one remembers a game is their own. But to say that anet promised something requires proof.Now this not to say either side of any argument in here is right or wrong. I see points on each, but as I have been watching this thread I have noticed that it is slowly devolving into a mute argument since the thread is already here, but at the same time it really doesn't help either gw1 or gw2 in any fashion. Up til now I was just finding the discussion interesting, but when someone claims something about anet saying something when I can't remember them every saying, I personally want proof they did.