Jump to content
  • Sign Up

Aracz.4702

Members
  • Posts

    35
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Aracz.4702

  1. @Leinhart.2981 said:

    @Leinhart.2981 said:Warrior doen't use magic, so yes, it's the most stupid idea I've ever seen. Ranged hammer... Why not a close range shortbow, because it's short! It definitly made for melee!

    While I don't like the idea the OP has, it's certainly not stupid because of the limitations YOU impose on what you think the warrior should be.

    I don't support changing any current weapons, but the espec is a reasonable way to petition for a ranged weapon.

    A ranged weapon is not a bad idea (even if we actually already have 2, we just need a correct rifle) but the idea of a warrior using magic is just stupid. If I want a mage knight I'll pick a guard. A war is a master of martial arts, that's all. We just need to respect the archetype.

    But warriors are using magic. Signets in lore are items infused in magic. Shouts and banners can be explained by magic (or you can imagine boons which they grant are just morale boost, but i think it's a bit more stupid than magic :D) , stances too, I just can't explain becoming immune to conditions while still being valuable to direct hits in other way, than by "magic". Just imagine situation - you get hit by poison dart. This dar't doesn't pierce through your skin (don't deal power damage), but it poisons you :DSame with almost everything which grants you a boons. Okay, you can explain for yourself it's a effect of... Adrenaline, morale, and temporary stances, but there are situations where you can explain it only by magic, or act like it didn't happen (retaliation/resistance/immunity/banners/deflecting arrow to it source with shield)

×
×
  • Create New...