Jump to content
  • Sign Up

Ianto.5483

Members
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ianto.5483

  1. Anyone who voted no probably plays a female and has a wide variety of cosmetics to choose from. Male players get the short end of the stick every time a new set comes out. Just give us SOMETHING, jeeze.
  2. There will be limitations on the numbers of guilds and the number of active players in an alliance and an alliance will bea smallish percentage of the total players of a world. Except: " Our current plans for alliance size are somewhere between 500-1000 members"and: "Because of this, there are plans to allow transfers between worlds during a season. This means that new worlds will have size restrictions on them, as they do currently." but a server cannot be x-ferd to unless the active pop drops below 90%. 91-100% is all you need to completely lock down a server as "invitation only". This new system will not add structure to WvW but give players far too much control over it and certain players will take advantage of this.
  3. I'm not sure I understand the point of this new system. You claim that it will help balance WvW but when guilds can just form alliances to completely bypass the world placements, then you'll just end up making a system like Archeage's player nations: Where all the best players are in 1 group stomping everyone else. I'm not even sure if there is a way to keep guildies together AND provide a balanced WvW experience for the majority of your playerbase. You're going to have to choose one or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...