It's almost like we need to design a system that works for both ;)But surely, the same sized groups can dominate NA if needed. Would you rather have an alliance with popular pugmanders and some of their following or secluded low-end PPT guilds? Replace ravya with some popular and active NA pugmander. I don't know. Sehoon? Cloudfly? Would you rather have 1 sehoon who tags, or 100 pugs as active as sehoon who won't. What do you think will be the most active after 2 months, the server with 1 sehoon regularly tagging for them or the server with 100 pugs who are usually active but have nothing to do other than roaming / PPT / small scale. I think 1 sehoon >> 100 equally active pugs. I also think after 2 months, the server with sehoon would have more active players than the server with 100 (!!) more pugs. Population inbalance creates itself : most pugs who don't auto-win log off or go back to PvE. Sehoon wants to go EU server again. more bags more farm. best pver;)
