JPUlisses.8756
-
Posts
124 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Blogs
Events
Articles
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Posts posted by JPUlisses.8756
-
-
14 hours ago, Beddo.1907 said:
I don't see why not. They should make one all about boon removal, with tanky stats, while they are at it.
Considering WvW the pet would probably be best not ranged and preferably not so tanky, but more DPS oriented.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Mell.4873 said:
A few people including myself have suggested replacing Restorative Strikes with another boon rip or corruption when Stunning a target.
Just include pets in that CC to boon removal and you would be golden.
I don't think boon rip should be tied to anything.
Just a pet timed rotation removing 1 single boon everyone.
Keeping it simple.
While that is better than nothing I would rather have a simple boon removal on the pet. Preferably on demand with f2 skill.
-
1
-
-
Can Rangers have a Boon Removal Pet?
It is known that Untamed can remove boons, however having at least one boon removal in ranger druid southeast would be great.
It can be tied to the beast skill so soulbeast does not have 2. And it's more on demand. But just 1 boon so it's not something that impacts too.
Pets always have this thing that they can do everything and cover the ranger weakness, yet no boon removal even if just 1.
-
3
-
1
-
1
-
-
also happened to me twice in a row. This queue bug is annoying because it always moves you to the end of the queue!
-
big hopes for melee auto fast cleave
-
1
-
-
26 minutes ago, Captain Sally.6249 said:
Would we believe it if there was?
there used to be, sometimes they even streamed about it, but there always was one preview even if just the notes.
-
1
-
-
Is there any balance update preview?
-
4
-
1
-
1
-
-
Druid needs buffs the most.
-
2
-
-
Scourge gives alacrity and barrier.
What weaver does better than scourge in raids?
Ante needs to pay attention and not give everything to a single class and nothing to other.
-
3
-
1
-
-
One blue boy down 99999999999k more down to go.
It is not like firebrand is not the best WvW class or anything by a mile
-
3
-
-
It just needs a bit more nerfs and maybe while still being the best support maybe it is a bit more fair and maybe one day not demanded in every WvW
-
2
-
-
We already have too many firebrand playing the game kthxbye
-
9
-
-
Before improving tempest they need to buff weaver more.
-
1
-
-
I can understand weaver but not tempest/cata
Maybe buff weaver.
-
1
-
-
Play minion mancer
-
2 minutes ago, Serephen.3420 said:
Well if they really wanted weaver the dual element spec, they wouldn't be asking to make it play like core ele, cata or tempest.
So what it seems they really want is the reduction in attunement recharge, not weaver itself.
They can ask for it and it's fine. The game play is totally different in weaver even with just 1 element than catalyst and tempest because it is still more complex. But I don't suppose a cata or temp would ever understand.
Weaver can be that single element and change to dual or have both choices sseparated. They were asking for it to be more simple by committing to a choice. Which would be optional as there is no way the dual elements would be removed from weaver.
It doesn't have to be the simple rotation as other eles.
Weaver just needs better power scaling so it can have decent options there, and adding a power stance would do just that and it could be powered by two different elements just like primordial stance but with a more power theme instead of condition.
-
1
-
2
-
-
On 4/19/2023 at 4:48 AM, Serephen.3420 said:
Or you can go play catalyst/tempest?
People want weaver not other specs. If they wanted other specs they wouldn't play weaver. Weaver is not cata/tempest.
The fact that I have to explain this such obvious explains a lot of the on going cata/tempest whining for buffs constantly.
-
1
-
1
-
-
Remove Unravel.
Add a minor trait that allows this single element at a time.
Add a new stance skill for power based characters similar to primordial stance but with power scaling.
-
1
-
2
-
-
It is obvious that Anet favouritism wise:
Catalyst > Tempest > Core > Weaver
-
1
-
2
-
-
Nerf catalysts, not all the elementalists specs.
Edit: I know cata crybabies are going to cry for buffs.
-
1
-
-
6 minutes ago, AliamRationem.5172 said:
I don't need to provide quickness or alac on weaver, but ngl it'd be so nice if weaver had self-quickness.
And that shouldn't be a problem. Selfish classes are ok as long they don't also require others.
It makes way less sense that mechanist has everything and weaver has nothing.
Now weaver getting self alac and/or self quickness would be way too fun and no one would play catalyst/tempest unless forced to for party content and that would create other problems.
-
It is obvious that Anet favouritism wise:
Catalyst > Tempest > Core > Weaver
-
1
-
1
-
-
Using x3d 1080p all on ultra except reflections and shadows and character limit. LoD effects off. 60fps always.
Going to test 4k once I have a 4k monitor, might need to tweak some things to keep stability.
-
The problem of weaver is that cata gives more quickness and tempest gives more alac.
Sure weaver is more fun but others don't care about your fun.
My thoughts on updated pistol for elementalist
in Elementalist
Posted
I like elementalist pistol.