Jump to content
  • Sign Up

Hindenburg.3415

Members
  • Posts

    136
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Hindenburg.3415

  1. HOT still stands as the best expansion ever. Unique and fun metas , great map design -  I mean I play this game for 5 years but still if I make 10 steps from waypoint in Tangled Depths -  I am lost.  Good story that feels personal and tense.

    After that we had POF -  hot pile of steaming garbage aside from mount system.  I hate everything about it - colors ,. flat maps , setting , enemies , story.

    And EOD is just mediocre. Better than POF , metas are decent , personally I like final meta it feels really epic. Jade tech visuals and concept are also nice.  Story is , again , decent.  I don't hate it ,  even liked Mai Trin part.

    • Like 1
    • Confused 3
  2. 28 minutes ago, Biziut.3594 said:

    Better not get too used to this. This should and will be nerfed. Faster the better. And thats comming from player who plays only thief for 10 years.

    Yeah.  They already reduced alacrity from 2s to 1.25 it was quick )

  3. 8 hours ago, Kodama.6453 said:

    Not sure what you mean with UH, but rifle is still viable, yeah.

    Rifle power mechanist lost alot of it's damage over all these nerfs, but you can still finish pretty much any content with it.
    The other 2 elite specs are better with their elite spec weapon for power builds, tho (hammer scrapper and sword holosmith respectively).

     

    Yes,  you can. But as it is not listed on SC now because it has like 30k dps or something ( on a q herald level ) some people can refuse to accept p mech as dps in their groups.

     

  4. I mean mob placement in gw2 is not as bad as it was in Tera for example ( I am talking 60 + areas packed with mobs ) but still annoying sometimes.

     

    Like come on , we all know that road blocks , traps and mobs with slow and cripple abilities exist only to annoy you  , slow you down and make you spend more time playing.

     

    But as I said above it's not so bad it could have been so I am ok with it.

    • Like 3
    • Confused 1
  5. On 12/20/2022 at 5:45 AM, Ashen.2907 said:

    I have goals that center around a need for large amounts of gold. No drop in the game feels exciting or even rewarding, but over time enough of them contribute to my long term goals. Not fun. In any way. But by thinking about my goal rather than the drops from my current play session I get by.

    Ultimately I think ANet bit off more than they could chew with a cosmetic reward and horizontal progression system. They cannot come close to producing cosmetics, nor introduce meaningful masteries, at a rate that satisfy the desire for rewards that dont feel like just another few coppers en route to that 1k gold purchase. 

     

     

    As a person without a single legendary I can understand.

    My whole bank is like 800g in mats and 300 in cash.

    And in order to make that gold you need to farm group content like t4 fractals or spend many hours in Drizzlewood or something.

    I don't want to do either of those things.

    So I just kind of gave up on legendaries.

     

    But I still like gw2 loot system.

    One of the healthiest economies I ever seen.

     

    • Like 1
  6. 3 hours ago, robertthebard.8150 said:

    I don't think it does, it's presented in comments in this very thread.  Of course, to know that, you'd actually have to read entire posts, instead of chopping them up.  If they didn't have issues with it, there wouldn't be multiple threads about it, right?

     

    You do understand that people  "have issues" for different reasons , right ?

    Of course, to know that, you'd actually have to read entire posts, instead of chopping them up. 

    3 hours ago, robertthebard.8150 said:

    Then there's this post, where you felt it was necessary to pull some lines out of context to respond to.  Thank you for providing a classic example of why some would just as soon hit an emoji, as type a post.  What's the point of typing something out, if someone is just going to butcher your post in an attempt to misrepresent what you said.  Congratulations? 🥱

     

    What context ?  I quoted a full sentence presenting a finished thought. What exactly was "misrepresented" ?

    Thank you for providing a classic example of why some should just move on because they clearly unable to participate in conversation.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
    • Confused 4
  7. 1 hour ago, robertthebard.8150 said:

    Sometimes, it's enough to read a post and know that attempting to discuss or debate the topic is a waste of one's time, and so an emoji will suffice. 

     

    Suffice for what exactly ?

    Letting people know you disagree with something ? Why ?

    1 hour ago, robertthebard.8150 said:

    What they're actually demonstrating is that they can't stand to have their ideas challenged and would rather people just didn't bother engaging if they're not going to validate whatever it is they've got to say.

     

    I would say that people who hide behind emojis instead of actually voicing their opinions can't stand to have their ideas challenged.

    Also it's cute that you think that using emojis actually "challenges" someone's ideas , lol

    • Like 1
    • Confused 9
    • Sad 1
  8. 53 minutes ago, Linken.6345 said:

    No they cant since it shows more people have the same opinion.

     

    And how exactly this is important ?

    This is debate not voting.

     

    42 minutes ago, Freya.9075 said:

    Many people on the forums have a need to express their opinions. That’s why most of them are here. Do you really think they would just move on? It is not meaningless as they are able to express their opinion without parroting others. Which is enough for them to feel they are heard. It adds value to the topic by showing support and disagreement. If a post got 10 dislikes and 1 like it’s a good indicator to show what people think of the discussion. 

     

    So you saying many people on forum act like children who have nothing to add to a conversation but still want to be "heard" ?

    And as I said before "what people think of the discussion" is irrelevant if they have nothing to say.

    This is debate not voting or something.

    • Like 1
    • Confused 8
  9. On 12/15/2022 at 11:26 PM, Batalix.2873 said:

    As long as it does "good enough" DPS it will always be favored by a pretty sizeable population of players who are lazy, and prioritize "ease of play" over engagement or skill.

     

    Or people just play one class because heal mech is meta right now ( and not easy to play ) ,  quick scrapper and power holo is a thing again, and mech is giga chad in open world and really useful for someone who wants to do solo bounties.

     

    For me biggest problem with pMech is not difficulty but nearly perfect dps application because of invincible mech and pew-pew rifle while other classes have to deal with timings , positioning , mechanics.

    Something from low difficulty , high damage , perfect application had to go.

    Dunno if devs did a good job I don't play pMech I play condi in OW.

     

    • Confused 3
  10. 6 hours ago, Freya.9075 said:

    You can show your disagreement or agreement without having to parrot what others already said. And that’s the better alternative, because forums would look way different without them. And not in a good way. Not sure what’s so difficult to understand about what I said. 

     

    You can , sure but it's a meaningless action which adds nothing to discussion unless it's a vote of some sort as I said.

    Not sure why this is so difficult to understand.

    6 hours ago, Freya.9075 said:

    Let me give you an example 👀

    forums be like: 

    1st person: -I think this is a good idea!

    2nd person: -I do not because reason. 
    3rd person: -I do not because same reason! 
    4th person: -what they said ^

    Wouldn’t it be a better solution if person 3 and 4 dislike the 1st persons post and like the 2nd persons post? Better than cluttering the forums with unneeded posts don’t you think? 

     

    Person 3 and 4 can just move on if their opinion was already voiced.

    • Like 1
    • Confused 3
    • Sad 1
  11. On 12/17/2022 at 7:55 AM, Freya.9075 said:

    Many times other people already made their argument. So using the reaction button makes their disagreement shown. And agreement. Would you rather people parroting each others making the same statements and not add anything more to the discussion? 

     

    This doesn't make any sense.

    If you made your argument then move on as I said.

    Or do you think that letting someone know that you disagree without actually saying anything can add something to discussion ? 🤦‍♂️

     

    On 12/17/2022 at 1:34 PM, Chichimec.9364 said:

    🤣 Ah me, you start with the name calling as you try to call out other people for not behaving the way you think they should. Thank you for providing a perfect example of the kind of people and posts I won't bother trying to actively engage with any further.  🤣

     

    Em , what ?

    Name calling ? Where ?

     

     

     

    • Haha 1
    • Confused 6
  12. On 12/15/2022 at 8:04 PM, Chichimec.9364 said:

    A thoughtful, intelligent discussion is something I can enjoy. When it becomes clear though that someone keeps arguing just because their ego was offended and they are intent on having the last word, I generally bail from the argument. If I disagree with something that person says in another post, I'll just leave the Confused emoji and not get into another ego based brawl with them. Other times, I may disagree with something someone posted but the discussion doesn't seem that worth having, so I'll just leave a Confused emoji

     

    So why do you need to do it if you don't want to engage in conversation ?

    Just move on without using any emojis.

     

    It a lazy way to say " I saw it and I disagree" without providing any actual argument so people can respond.

    Anet really should remove this garbage.

    • Like 3
    • Haha 1
    • Confused 17
  13. 7 hours ago, Yer.8096 said:

    Please ANet team, if you really want equity, so do equity: same ammount control, heal, dps, stability, quickness, alacrity, might, condition variety, poison, boon strip, block, invulnerability, asegis and, specially for elementalists and thieves, same ammount of survivability for PvE damage builds, without any attribute sacrifice like the rest of professions

     

    And then people are going to cry that all classes feel the same and there is no class "identity"

     

    Been there saw that.

     

    • Like 1
  14. 7 hours ago, WhimsicalPacifist.2943 said:

    Are you a hardcore masochist piano player who will enjoy a class balanced against immobile golem benchmarks?  Like rollercoaster series of nerf/buff/nerf/nerf?  Want a class that Celestial is mandatory for taking on certain bounties when other classes use Berserker/Vipers on?

     

    If yes, the class is a perfect fit!

     

    I mean pretty much any open world build aimed on doing bounties and metas solo uses celestial , trailblazer or any other gear with defensive stats. 

    Pure viper or berserker is for masochists.  Not to mention that for certain classes celestial and berserk have comparable damage.

  15. 5 hours ago, Arianth Moonlight.6453 said:

    Reaper needed 50% damage boost, not 5% but yeah, I'm back at the top in the DPS meter, at least for open content where no one really try to pull their best DPS...

     

    Maybe you should check your math again.

     

    3 hours ago, draxynnic.3719 said:

    Because they added more than was in the original preview. This wasn't the feedback being wrong, this was the balance team listening to the feedback.

     

    Nope. Absolute majority of damage increase came from initial patch notes. ( barbs , auto , executioner's )

    But whatever makes you feel better I guess.

    • Like 1
    • Confused 3
  16. 8 hours ago, DexterousGecko.6328 said:

    This is the reason OP's suggestion will never happen. Create a problem, sell you the solution.

     

    I don't think this is completely fair.

    Having tp scrolls already HUGE alt-friendly QoL feature.

    Most games are not going to offer you even that.

    And shared slots add even more convenience to it.

     

    So it's kinda win-win situations imo.

     

×
×
  • Create New...