WvW : Anet vs Players

[Aeolus.3615]

On 11/9/2022 at 4:30 PM, Hackuuna.4085 said:

I don't even understand how red bl continues the way it has for all these years. In nearly every single matchup since it was added it has the lowest WvW activity.

The map isnt bad if was in another mmo :) with better combat depth besides ktrain empty strutures.

 

Imagine if guilds had to take care of structures while structures would provide unique mechanics that could be used in both wvw and pve and those items could only be used by the guilds that own the structures.

Fire keep could be a siege factory emporing unique siege.. real siege no the awfull transmogs...

IF WvW doesnt envolve besides a ktrain empty crap gamemode it wont be good.

Edited November 22, 2022 by Aeolus.3615

[Mabi black.1824]

9 hours ago, Invalid.8765 said:

Lack of Anet dev response is par for the course. Most of the threads in WvW and PvP section highlighting the glaring lack of content/Anet effort and ideas to improve with little effort go unnoticed by the devs

It would be really nice to have someone from the development here on this section of the forum, he could also be anonymous and in an unofficial capacity, just know that he is part of the working group, and could give some answers if he is aware of it or express his interpretations of what is the thought of development on many small things. This does not take anything away from Anet, this is his game, they created it, and they do everything they want anyway. 

But it could be nice for us, for the WWW community. We've only seen the work in progress to create the graphical page of alliance management and selection, and it's a lot of work just that. But what are your predictions for alliances only + or - 1 year ? 2 years ?

Alliances provide for a control of transfers, can we think of starting to control them immediately or is it hard work for development? or, for EU to consider joining two servers to grant homogeneous treatment is very complicated? 

Or, have you considered lowering server limits to see if players can distribute better? Or, with alliances we delete our medal table and server ranking. What does Anet imagine for the future? How do players compare, what reference should we imagine?

In short, all the usual questions, which we see in this section of the forum, grant this community some information, join and we chat about anything, freely, serenely, maybe something good comes out, and in any case you will not be judged because you remain anonymous and do not represent anyone officially. It will only be personal information and thoughts of someone who deals with anything in the group.

[Custodio.6134]

13 hours ago, Invalid.8765 said:

They are quick to tell you to stay on topic or thread will be closed, but when it comes to anything else, crickets.

That are not the devs tho, but the forum moderators. They are employees at ANet, but are completely unrelated to the devs, and their only task is to ensure to follow the forum rules (staying on topic is one of them). 

 

In the extra life stream they told us that they (believe it or not) do actually read the forums. 

 

Sadly, pretty much nobody at ANet/dev-team does actually care to respond (especially to permanently reoccurring topics). This is the point you should critizise, not topics being closed because they go...... off-topic... 

Edited November 22, 2022 by Custodio.6134