FelixWolf.2348

We have SAB Boom Boxes which also have metal variants, why not Metal Legion Boom Box? Also there is the TT6-B Devourer which is a tank which launches stuff, why not make it into a turtle skin? I think the drifting mechanic of the turtle would work great with it. (Could even make it play the metal legion music like in the strike mission)

Short and simple idea: We already have /talk as a emote. What if it was possible to enable this in the settings to have this as a "typing" animation. If it is party chat, it'd only show to party members. Otherwise if map or local chat, play the animation for everyone.

I do like them, but part of the fun is to be able to show them off to people. While I understand infusions and what not can be obnoxious, I don't think all visual items should be disabled. What I am getting from the idea is that all visual items will be disabled, not just the really big/heavy visual items.

As someone who has spent quite a bit of money on gem store items, I see a lot of people saying they are going to disable player visual effects. What I am understanding is that "visual effects" includes minis, pets, etc. "Disable player item sounds" already impacts instruments. To me, it sounds like what it is going to do is just set everything to their default models and what not. At which point, what is the point of buying visual items on the gem store if probably half, if not more, of the player base wont even see it?

I am on NA. For some reason though I've not seen this issue before when listing groups in LFG. Is it just I haven't ever had people from EU regions join my LFG, or did LFG break and show it to both EU and US?

I've not experienced this before, but ever since linking my character's WvW team to a guild, I'm no longer able to play fractals with users in the EU regions. I'm not sure if it is because of WvW linking, or if LFG is broken and showing it US player LFGs to EU player LFGs(Which apparently EU players cant play with US players regarding instanced content?). Error code is: 1006:9:7:392:101

It is part of a construction project. Ascalon belonged to the Charr, then the humans took it. Once we took it back they cried and were like "why you do?" and left their ghosts behind. Now we are going to give them something truly to cry about, by plopping a giant second core in the middle of Divinity's Reach. Jokes aside, I'm not sure if Anet accidentally shipped the wrong version of the map, or accidentally replaced a model.

Absolutely not. I don't use windows, and getting Guild Wars 2 to run nicely on *nix takes a bit of wrangling. Adding anti-cheat would shut out anyone using wine(*nix based operating systems such as linux or mac) to play GW2. I've dealt with games not having a anti-cheat at one point then suddenly adding it and I get something like easy anti-cheat complaining that it can't properly spy on me from within the compatibility layer, therefore I could no longer play the game I had paid for. Additionally, stuff like punkbuster is considered a privacy invasion as it includes built-in remote desktop(view only). This doesn't work with grabbing just the window, it grabs the entire screen. I do not want others to see my desktop, especially since I multi-task and there is some stuff that I don't want other to see(I.E. browser tabs, second life, NDA source code, etc). Stuff like Denuvo uses 100% of your disk I/O for some unknown reason, and if your disk happens to be SSD, it'll significantly reduce the life span of it. (I.E. Damaging consumer's hardware) When it comes to anti-cheats, there are only three types: Aggressive, laggy, and intrusive. Light weight, only detects known cheats and basic cheating methods. Built for the game, spot on, non-intrusive and effective anti-cheat. PB, Denuvo, and EAC both fit 1; VAC would fit 2; 3 don't have names because they are built in. Are there cheaters in WvW? Yes, but they are very rare. Is it frustrating when they cheat in WvW? Of course. I've seen like 3 towers fall because a cheater portal'd in a squad and took it. Can anything be done about? Yes, report them. Granted, the report mechanism is hit or miss, you have to be able to see the player and click them to report them. Doesn't help that you can't see player names in WvW either. IMO, Anti-cheats are similar to DRM. The more intrusive the implementation, the worse it will effect the end user. Cheaters will get around it one way or another and may end up having a much better experience.

Not sure if this has been suggested before, but a flame legion shaman outfit/armor set would be neat.

Honestly, I think it is a bit too late to change that because you are going to have these scenarios: People who don't like the timegate and decided not to get the mount probably already have a bad taste in their mouth and likely not going to go and try for it again, therefor removal won't really fix it(??? I think?).People who have progressed, not all but probably a lot, are going to get mad because "OH BUT YOU FORCED US TO WAIT BUT NOT EVERYONE ELSE?".Personally I would have loved it not to have a timegate, Perhaps ArenaNet could use this as experience from playerbase and not do timegated mounts in the future(if there are more mounts. I'm going to say there are probably going to be more mounts).But what is done is done, I'll just grind until sunday until I get the mount because I MISSED THE FIRST RESET. ;-; Also my comment to those who say "DON'T RUSH": Some people like to rush and beat each other to getting content as fast as possible, and maybe that isn't your play style, that's fine. But some people want to. Without a timegate you have both options, you can pace yourself or speed through faster than copyrighted blue hedgehog.