Jump to content
  • Sign Up

Kozumi.5816

Members
  • Posts

    880
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Kozumi.5816

  1. It's a battle pass, and battlepasses either might as well not exist as you passively finish them(like this one seems to be) or completely ruin the game.

    They're kind of a gigantic waste of development time, and usually only worth it due to the premium aspect. There's no premium aspect to this one, so I think Anet just wasted resources on a useless system.

    • Like 4
    • Confused 7
  2. 1 hour ago, ugrakarma.9416 said:

    in EoD they messed with fractals to promote Eod strikes.


    People don't really do strikes still. it's extremely niche content unlike fractals. Not only due to strikes being not that fun, but the main reason is because they are devoid of rewards. This "rewards" team thinks a proper CM reward is a weapon skin for completing it 25 times, too.

    Weapon skins are not rewards in a game with legendary weapons.

    • Like 5
    • Confused 3
  3. 16 hours ago, LucianTheAngelic.7054 said:

    There's a lot of massive overthinking in this thread honestly. It's not that deep and it's really quite simple: Shiro will always use IO for damage and that's fine. Decreasing energy costs on its utility skills allows you to actually use them, ya know, for utility without completely tanking your dps. 

    Simple solution (and the only solution that needs to happen) is to decrease the ridiculous energy costs, NOT rework the entire upkeep system or overload skills with even more effects. This is PvE and none of Shiro's skills would be ridiculously abusable if the costs were decreased a bit and we certainly don't need a full rework of Rev mechanics simply to boost Shiro's usability.

    The skills are good, they just are too pricey to ever use.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    • Confused 1
  4. 7 hours ago, IAmNotMatthew.1058 said:

    Ah yes, people disagreeing with the need of a system that wouldn't work in GW2 means you're selling services.

    I don't understand how you think having a premade finder where users select their role(what they already do) and a system where commanders can request a role (WHAT THEY ALSO ALREADY DO) can't work in GW2.

    Am I living in another dimension?

    • Like 1
    • Confused 5
  5. 3 hours ago, IAmNotMatthew.1058 said:

    WoW is rigid with the roles,

    So is GW2.

      

    4 hours ago, Linken.6345 said:

    I rather resources be spent elsewere and if you see the latest mini expansion they dont have alot of resources to spare it seems.

    LFG is a core feature of the game that should be updated to 2023. Anet is a AAA company, no excuses.

    • Haha 1
    • Confused 7
  6. 4 minutes ago, IAmNotMatthew.1058 said:

    You seem to not pay attention to how you're trying to force a system tailored for a different game into GW2. If I play Firebrand I can be DPS, quickDPS, Heal, Healquick, and even tank as either one of those roles, while in WoW if I join as Blood DK I'm tank, I get assigned as tank, because Blood DK in WoW is tank. If I join as BM Hunter I'm DPS, I can't play anything else.

    Players literally join my group, and tell me their roles. They could...select it from a UI instead. 

    Do you think none of this could be coded. I'm so confused, lol.

    • Confused 6
  7. 2 hours ago, Nimris.3781 said:

    i already told you that game cannot determine role of players thus it cannot require/request it. 

    What?  Most of the time anyone  who joins my group they tell me their role, and LFGS request roles in the comments. Are they somehow doing the impossible?

    It must really be hard selling raids if people are this adamantly against trying to make it easier to form groups in a MMO.

    • Confused 6
  8. On 8/11/2023 at 3:18 PM, Aaron Forestman.4758 said:

    Silent Surf CM is certainly doable, but my group (all with all the new achievements from it) avoids it unless it's a daily. This is because it's simply not profitable. The other CMs all give an ascended ring or ascended salvage kit drop, while SS has neither. Unless you're trying to speed up mist attunements a bit more by getting the bonus 100 relics & 2 pristines, it's a total waste of time.

    It's ok in 5 years we'll only have unprofitable fractals.

    • Like 1
    • Confused 5
  9. LFGs specifically ask for roles all the time. Having that as selection (qdps, alac dps, dps, alac healer, etc..) AND forcing someone to "request to join as x role" instead of "random person joins your party without your consent and you have no idea what they are"  would be a huge improvement. A decent dev could code this in a day.

    Do people think GW2 doesn't have roles...?

    • Confused 6
  10. 7 hours ago, SoftFootpaws.9134 said:

    unfortunately, there's a handful of players on this forum who are against quality of life and would prefer the game be left in the dark ages, so i don't bother arguing about this topic anymore, and this is probably the last time i'll post on it.

    They benefit from being able to clog the LFG list with services.

    • Haha 1
    • Confused 6
  11. 10 minutes ago, Sobx.1758 said:

    requires the creator of the group to accept/decline people that join

    This is needed too. I'm sick of having to kick people who won't read.

     

    11 minutes ago, Sobx.1758 said:

    it won't check if people joining fit in the role they signed up for

    You cannot sign up as a role you cannot fill in WoW. However, this would require Anet to actually embrace the fact they're designing "alac supports" and such(it could be tied to having the talent selected - very simple), but they seem to like pretending their game doesn't have roles/trinity still for whatever reason.

    • Confused 4
  12. 3 hours ago, Sobx.1758 said:

    Did you (and kozumi) address any of my posts here? No? Then who's "against discussion" here? Are you seriously somehow trying to build a claim that if someone disagrees with your complaint, they're selling raids? That's supposed to be your (...and kozumis) "argument" for anything here when it's simply completely false? That''s your idea of having a discussion about lfg (when, again, you seem to not be even talking about lfg, but instead about group ownership)?  🤦‍♂️

    Ridiculous.

     

    https://www.wowhead.com/guide/using-the-premade-group-finder-6090#:~:text=The Premade Group Finder is,Player).

    This is what people want.

    • Confused 4
  13. 2 hours ago, Sobx.1758 said:

    Not only they aren't really inaccessible, but the idea that  -if they were inaccessible- people talking here somehow benefit from it is just false and a terrible attempt to avoid addressing anything anyone actually says.

    You're right, there's never a single raid sale ad in LFG! Silly me.

    • Like 1
    • Confused 5
  14. 6 hours ago, SoftFootpaws.9134 said:

    you know, every time a thread comes up like this, a handfulof players defend the design of the lfg and all i have to say is, that's weird. we all know its bad, and any of us who have played another game know just how bad it actually is, not just that its bad. repeatedly replying to threads asking for some degree of progress in this way saying its not necesary isn't helpful, and this is becoming very common on these forums for some reason.

    It's because they benefit from raids being inaccessible.

    • Confused 6
  15. 4 hours ago, NewAge.5724 said:

    CM fractals ( Silent Surf 100%) feels so worthless for the Time you Spend There.

    Don't do silent surf, maybe if few enough players do it they'll abandon fractals and invest it into a end game type instead since fractals were a good and completed form of content and now every new fractal just harms the mode and makes it less fun AND less rewarding since deepstone.

    • Like 1
    • Confused 4
×
×
  • Create New...