TallBarr.2184

I would pay 5000 gems to unlearn Raven attunement

I wish, but i need the icebrood saga ones and alot of them are connected to drms and stuff, which i rather not touch. Id rather be able to pay a fee to unlearn a mastery and use those points.

Low on mastery points and would gladly unlearn some masteries i dont want

@SystemAny chance we can revisit this policy, would be so much fun running around with multiple accounts in wvw, bored of pve. Should be allowed as long as you play actively, so much potential, cheers

If its anets bots they should tell us. Not doing anything looks worse.

Allow multiboxing in world vs world if: -Accounts are on the same server-Map is not queued-Must play actively-No macros-Is responsive

If any dev writes in this thread i will eat a sock

Allow multiboxing in world vs world if: -Accounts are on the same server-Map is not queued-Must play actively-No macros-Is responsive

Why didnt you just leave the match then

If you had read the post one of the policy changes i suggested was not allowing multiboxing on queued maps That sounds great. But then again it doesn’t. How does the system know that you have a ‘multi boxed’ account open when the map queues? Would you have to register your accounts as ‘linked’ to prevent them from being involved in the same matchup? Or the same map? Where are the preventative measures to prevent the potential abuse? - How would they know, and how could you be prevented from having them on a matched server.. You offer no controls. Of course, a developer could check.. yes.. from reports. But nothing identifies you or the account as a multiboxer for people. Sooo many things are ‘at your word’ for this game. I get it. But that doesn’t mean we have to say it’s fine nor that it’s OK by Anet in these modes.Can i put accounts on different servers now? - yesWould i be in trouble if anet found out - yes Policy i suggested: Can i put accounts on different servers now? - yesWould i be in trouble if anet found out - yes What identifies a multiboxer in openworld? multiboxing is allowed in openworld, same rules would apply there as in wvw.

Just because there are rules doesnt mean some people wont break them. I could go in game now and say the gamer word, the likeliness of me not getting banned is small, but the likeliness fo me getting banned is high. Just like with all policies the risk of me getting banned is higher if i breach them. Its illegal to steal, people still steal things.

If you had read the post one of the policy changes i suggested was not allowing multiboxing on queued maps That sounds great. But then again it doesn’t. How does the system know that you have a ‘multi boxed’ account open when the map queues? Would you have to register your accounts as ‘linked’ to prevent them from being involved in the same matchup? Or the same map? Where are the preventative measures to prevent the potential abuse?-

Imagine 100 multiboxers with 800 accounts, your argument is extreme because the likelihood of that even happening is about zero. If you read the post one of the new policy points would be accounts must be played actively. I'm not sure but knowing how most multiboxers play i would say sitting afk with necros doesnt cut it. I'm on a full server and even on primetime not all servers are full and 1 of the policy points i suggested would be not allowing multiboxing if the border is queued. I know that eotm doesnt reward pips, but i stated that you could do some of the dailies there. All i am saying is that people will abuse it. Some say some still do it even to this day.People will always break rules no matter the context. If people breach it they should get banned simple as that. My point is the current policy of flat out "NOT ALLOWED AT ALL" is not good. People who afk or do whatever will continue to do so whatever the policy would be, changing it would just allow legitimate players to activate. It would not affect people who abuse because they already do it.

If you had read the post one of the policy changes i suggested was not allowing multiboxing on queued maps

Imagine 100 multiboxers with 800 accounts, your argument is extreme because the likelihood of that even happening is about zero. If you read the post one of the new policy points would be accounts must be played actively. I'm not sure but knowing how most multiboxers play i would say sitting afk with necros doesnt cut it. I'm on a full server and even on primetime not all servers are full and 1 of the policy points i suggested would be not allowing multiboxing if the border is queued. I know that eotm doesnt reward pips, but i stated that you could do some of the dailies there.

Hello I have multiboxed for multiple years now and something that has bothered me ever since the policy change to multiboxing (not allowing it in competitive modes) is that i am totally locked out of content i would be perfectly capable of playing in, put actual value to my server and enjoy. I get it... "real" world vs world has a limited amount of spots, having multiple accounts logged in can skew the population values. Yes.... there could be specific character comps that would be pretty degenerate and annoying to encounter as an enemy. But there are still positives and negatives. A multiboxer can never manouvre his accounts as fast as someone who plays single account, a multiboxer would not have the upper hand on open field and would get easily shut down by an enemy player. I WvW is not all about fighting enemies, face to face, even if some people like to think so. There are alot of player vs enviroment elements in WvW, such as taking structures, scouting, etc. I can do tier 4 fractals, DRM CMs, strike missions any open world event with my accounts but trying to flip structures in WvW is a big nono. I get it that multiboxers generally have a bad reputation of afking or leeching but some of us actually want to play the game actively. Some of you will say "just play on 1 account" thats fair but multiboxing to me is something that keeps me interested in the game, and makes the game alot more enjoyable. Multiboxing in itself is challenging if you do harder content and its not super easy to manouvre. The idea of trying to take a tower knowing that at any time enemy can show up and mess things up is exciting. People who try solo towers solo doesnt do it because its the easiest way to flip towers, they do it because its challenging for them (i would assume). Some of you would say "you just want extra rewards" personally i would gladly literally destroy thousand of gold if this policy changed. Yes there are items in WvW i need. I am trying to get the legendary ring on all my accounts, if i did them seperately it would take about 44 months if i maxed out tickets every week, vs about 7 weeks if i did them at once. But i am not doing this for gold. Here are some of my propositions how to change the multiboxing policy in World vs World: Accounts must be played actively, no sitting at spawn like a monkeyAccounts must be on the same server. I know there are still monkeys who do this, they go to enemy server and scout for the opposing team or sabotages in general.Multiboxing not allowed in maps that are queued. Maps full? well tough luck try again later.Must be responsiveEDGE OF THE MISTS EOTM is literally the most dead gamemode in the game, you can run around the map and not see a single player. Here is a video of a matchup were literally 4 structures has been captured in 234 minutes https://streamable.com/2lysfi Not allowing multiboxing in EOTM makes literally no sense to me. 99% of the time there are nothing but npcs in there, why am i not allowed to try flip a tower for daily or kill some veteran guards it doesnt affect anyone negatively. Lastly, PVP and WVW should not be having the same policy, they are different gamemodes entirely. WVW is huge maps with alot of pve elements and you can actually be useful in there. There is no way a 2 man multibox in ranked or a 5 man multibox in tournament could ever have a chance vs other players. Multiboxing in pvp was and is a gold farm and it made perfectly sense why its not allowed in there. Have you ever seen a 5 man multibox in ATs actually try win the game? no, they sit in spawn, or log off all accounts but 1.

Allow multiboxing in world vs world if accounts are on the same server and: Map is not queuedMust play activelyNo macrosDo the right thing

@ArenaNet Team.4819

Allow multiboxing in world vs world if the accounts are on the same server and actively played

Allow multiboxing in EOTM if accounts are on the same server and played actively

Allow multiboxing in eotm if all accounts are on the same server and played actively

Can you show a picture of the effect

monthly reminder to allow multiboxing in wvw if the accounts are on the same server, alternatively allow it in edge of the mists, edge of the mists is dead and doesnt affect "real" world vs world @System @anet

Feels high still or is my dmg dogtier

Can you heal the golems