Stand The Wall.6987 Posted June 2 Share Posted June 2 a simple way for the guild lead to upvote another guild for preference in reshuffling. if we get reshuffled with that guild/ guilds cool, if not hopefully next time. its far from ideal but its better than nothing 2 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawdler.8521 Posted June 2 Share Posted June 2 Such as system would make exactly zero sense for the same reason these posts will mostly get confused “likes”. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MedievalThings.5417 Posted June 2 Share Posted June 2 This is just a "hey Anet, can we stack a single super-world with every super-comped guild...thanks in advance". This is the reason we can't have nice things. Because everyone wants to just ride around the map pressing 1 with no thought or real challenge. 4 of the last 5 betas I got a world with ZERO big guilds. Roamer/solo world every time. We had the outnumbered buff 18-20 hours a day all week. The other 2 worlds in those matches had 25-30 man guild groups most of the day, The new system is going to be bad enough as it is, but allowing people to super-stack even further is NOT needed. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gop.8713 Posted June 3 Share Posted June 3 19 hours ago, Stand The Wall.6987 said: a simple way for the guild lead to upvote another guild for preference in reshuffling. if we get reshuffled with that guild/ guilds cool, if not hopefully next time. its far from ideal but its better than nothing You could use the conveniently created sixth guild slot to all join the same guild and boldly charge into alliances that way, unless you feel the 500v1 might be more than you can manage . . ? 17 hours ago, MedievalThings.5417 said: This is just a "hey Anet, can we stack a single super-world with every super-comped guild...thanks in advance". This is the reason we can't have nice things. Because everyone wants to just ride around the map pressing 1 with no thought or real challenge. 4 of the last 5 betas I got a world with ZERO big guilds. Roamer/solo world every time. We had the outnumbered buff 18-20 hours a day all week. The other 2 worlds in those matches had 25-30 man guild groups most of the day, The new system is going to be bad enough as it is, but allowing people to super-stack even further is NOT needed. This is the future. Roamer/solo worlds are actually what you want. Don't let them know, they'll start working against us ; p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldJanx.6798 Posted June 4 Share Posted June 4 Quote instead of alliances how about changing the game dynamic in ways that don't require 10 years of game development, kitten everybody off and kill off the game mode? how about putting bounding boxes on player models in wvw and forcing players to not "stack" when they play? ... give the game an actual new feel and challenge after 12 years instead of changing maths to boons / conditions... killing every server is a terrible idea. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MedievalThings.5417 Posted June 4 Share Posted June 4 On 6/3/2024 at 4:47 AM, Gop.8713 said: You could use the conveniently created sixth guild slot to all join the same guild and boldly charge into alliances that way, unless you feel the 500v1 might be more than you can manage . . ? This is the future. Roamer/solo worlds are actually what you want. Don't let them know, they'll start working against us ; p The lack of any comps is only an issue due to game design. The part that was the problem, was that 18+ hours a day, all 7 days the world was outnumbered on every map. This happened 4 of the last 5 betas. The other 2 servers had no shortage of players regularly during the day. If it only happened once I wouldn't be concerned, but it happened almost every beta. So much for balancing the populations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawdler.8521 Posted June 4 Share Posted June 4 29 minutes ago, MedievalThings.5417 said: The lack of any comps is only an issue due to game design. The part that was the problem, was that 18+ hours a day, all 7 days the world was outnumbered on every map. This happened 4 of the last 5 betas. The other 2 servers had no shortage of players regularly during the day. If it only happened once I wouldn't be concerned, but it happened almost every beta. So much for balancing the populations. Got the matchup scores to back that up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now