keenedge.9675 Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 Glyph of Volatility (unused) - description seems wrong The part beneath the titleThe wiki has copied the info so it doesn't clarify anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linken.6345 Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 What about it seems wrong?You get volatile magic when you use said tool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lahmia.2193 Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 It states you gain unbound magic (season 3 currency) rather than volatile magic (season 4 currency). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inculpatus cedo.9234 Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 I don't see where the Wiki has incorrect information.That, or it gets it from the API, and the API has been updated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keenedge.9675 Posted December 12, 2018 Author Share Posted December 12, 2018 Still incorrect today - no change.The title volatility (implies) 'Volatile Magic', the description says Unbound Magic.Two DIFFERENT things.Wiki repeats it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inculpatus cedo.9234 Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 Maybe you are using a different Wiki?Rewards bonus Volatile Magic while gathering in addition to the gathering results.Double-click to apply this to a gathering tool.— In-game descriptionhttps://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/Glyph_of_Volatility Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darksome.1697 Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 The "Glyph of Volatility" in-game item has the description that it returns Unbound Magic, which is clearly wrong (unless it DOES return Unbound Magic, but then there are two glyphs returning Unbound Magic). The wiki states it returns Volatile Magic, but the in-game item description does not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khisanth.2948 Posted December 12, 2018 Share Posted December 12, 2018 The actual glyph has the correct desctiption.It is only the container that is wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.