CaptainBes.5834

Fortnite Super Smash Bros anything that is even close to what gw2 is?fortnite is a joke and super smash bros is 1v1 game. lol what Both of those games might actually be the top 2 most successful pvp video game titles that the world has ever seen. Both use individual stat systems along with trackers for general win/loss rate. The psychological theory behind these games is that "the players always feel like they are winning even if they are losing" which is what I was explaining in the OP post, about what GW2 ranked is missing. Go watch some youtube videos about it, there are plenty that explain why those two game titles have been successful on unprecedented levels. And if you think Smash Bros is a 1v1 game, well I guess this discussion is over before it began. i play smash competitively and doubles barely counts. its 90% of the time 1v1. what are you even talking about? Depends what branch you're running through in your local area. Most of the tournaments presented in my local area were all ffa. Only once did we ever have 1v1 that was linked to national finals. The game does offer after all,1v1, 2v2, 3v3, 4v4, and up to 8 player ffa. You could claim that "1v1 is the most prestigious smash format" but claiming that the Smash series is a 1v1 game is just plainly incorrect. The entire series is designed from the ground up to be a ffa game. ive never once done a 3v3 in my entire life. ive only done FFA with my child cousins for fun (with items enabled). if you pull up smash tournaments on twitch it is literally ALWAYS 1v1 and occasionally 2v2. youre literally just in the wrong here. Of course that's what the streamers are doing all day. 1v1 is easier to stream and it's easier to watch with no shout-caster. Also with Smash, the camera zooms in on players much closer during 1v1 than it does if 8 players are out in the field jumping around the map, which again, is better for viewing. Go figure why the coverage always goes to the 1v1 stage. There are plenty of other tournament formats that happen such as ffa. They just don't get the coverage like 1v1 for the reasons mentioned above. But it does get covered sometimes. Here you go: 2v2 - 3v3 - 4v4 - 4man ffa - 8man ffa - 2v2 - normal doubles stuff but its online and team damage off which makes it ultra meme. you couldve included like any of the actual professional doubles matches in the past 20 years.3v3 - not even 3v3, its just tag team/crew battle with 3 players each.4v4 teams - a literal 1 off meme which is even stated in the video. its basically never happened in any tournament in the 6 years since this video4man FFA - its an "official" nintendo tournament which are always the least competitive and most out of touch with the scene lol. enough said. like you might as well say spvp is balanced around 8v8 legacy mid team fight because the community ran a tournament for it once in 2014. just because you can find obscure examples does not mean people EVER use these game types for tournaments more than once every other year.

Fortnite Super Smash Bros anything that is even close to what gw2 is?fortnite is a joke and super smash bros is 1v1 game. lol what Both of those games might actually be the top 2 most successful pvp video game titles that the world has ever seen. Both use individual stat systems along with trackers for general win/loss rate. The psychological theory behind these games is that "the players always feel like they are winning even if they are losing" which is what I was explaining in the OP post, about what GW2 ranked is missing. Go watch some youtube videos about it, there are plenty that explain why those two game titles have been successful on unprecedented levels. And if you think Smash Bros is a 1v1 game, well I guess this discussion is over before it began. i play smash competitively and doubles barely counts. its 90% of the time 1v1. what are you even talking about? Depends what branch you're running through in your local area. Most of the tournaments presented in my local area were all ffa. Only once did we ever have 1v1 that was linked to national finals. The game does offer after all,1v1, 2v2, 3v3, 4v4, and up to 8 player ffa. You could claim that "1v1 is the most prestigious smash format" but claiming that the Smash series is a 1v1 game is just plainly incorrect. The entire series is designed from the ground up to be a ffa game.ive never once done a 3v3 in my entire life. ive only done FFA with my child cousins for fun (with items enabled). if you pull up smash tournaments on twitch it is literally ALWAYS 1v1 and occasionally 2v2. youre literally just in the wrong here.

some of the 3v3 arenas just have bad pathing issues. thats the only thing.

Yes and that’s actually the whole point of mmorpg, Leveling & farming to win. The more time you invest, the stronger you get. Else you’ll be playing tekken or any other multiplayer games where there is no leveling and just practicing. now you understand :) we play gw2 bc its like a fighting game mmo where skill matters :) theres many other MMOs for people who like to mindlessly grind to pretend theyre good like you though!

game isnt balanced rn cuz some random things do way too much damage (herald, grenades etc). maybe once the jigga damage coefficients get nerfed back to everything else's level the game will be fun. I don't really like how the CD system is rn though.

sounda fair considering how busted grenade barrage is :)

even tho trapper DH is certainly a meme its the only spec that's fun out of literally ALL guardian specs right now. who wants to play core symbols, DH symbols, FB symbols, core burn, or FB burn? not me lol. let me have fun.

pretty much this but without the double necro comp