Tons of feedback here that I simply haven’t got the time to read through, so I’m sure I’ll be repeating other oft mentioned comments. Here’s my take: Arenanet has to monetize the game resources somehow. I don’t begrudge them trying to position new, highly requested options at a price they thought the market might support. I’ve seen multiple posts from individual players requesting certain features at insane prices - gems or gold, sometimes in excess of 5000 gems or 10000 gold - just because they wanted the features that badly, I guess. I think we can point to those players as the scapegoats for the current mount prices. Why didn’t Anet sell these skins individually? I think they knew some were totally meh and people would only want the super cool ones. Offer all of them at premium gem prices - even 600-700 gems - and everyone would only buy the “cool” ones, and the unimpressive skins would be a waste of design resources. Everyone would be running a pyroclast jackal or a star bound griffon. The attempt to diversify mount aesthetics would be a failure. So force the less impressive skins into the mix and maybe people will use them anyway. Still, I think the pricing for the current offerings is way off. As a loot box gamble, adoption licenses should only be 200-250 gems. Maybe they’ll correct the pricing with a sale in 3 months. I can only hope. The reforged war hound is way too expensive. 800 gems is a far more reasonable price. Maybe 1000 since it does have exclusive effects to set it apart from the rabble. But it’s only a jackal mount skin and I can’t imagine a large number of people will prefer jackal travel for the majority of their wanderings. Yes, there are some, I’m sure, but I don’t see the majority primarily hopping on a jackal. Maybe that’s just me. In any case, $25 US is crazy expensive for a fashion wars statement in my opinion. I trust Anet is learning from this but I have to wonder why it was a lesson to learn in the first place. Didn’t they already cover this ground with glider skins? They’ve settled on a reasonable and sustainable pricing strategy with gliders. How is this different? The differentiation of mounts have very little bearing on the marketability of specific skins. It seems to me that the pricing for gliders would’ve been an ideal model for mount skins. Maybe someone can explain to me how it’s different.