Jump to content
  • Sign Up

Ashen.2907

Members
  • Posts

    6,988
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ashen.2907

  1. The idea of a zone where undergeared new players without access to the power creep built into elite specs and the like would be hunted by veterans whose characters are vastly more powerful is.... I honestly am not sure how to express how badly this would go.
  2. I am an arachnophobe, but the ones we see in game dont bother me all that much. That said, after SotO's design made specific, previously optional, mounts essentially mandatory I would rather not see any more mounts added to the game.
  3. No they hadn't. Utopia was not announced. The point stands that even if we change the statement that I originally quoted to be, "only one company," rather than, "no company," we are talking about the only game company to ever do so. Now this means that the one specific company that we are discussing has done what is being discussed and dismissed. Personally I dont particularly care. If GW2 continues I will continue to play (depending on the direction of the game). If GW3 comes out I will at least check it out.
  4. Isnt the only "news" essentially that GW3 is not in development at this time?
  5. I had no idea this infusion existed. It actually sounds like something I would be interested in. Any idea of the drop rate?
  6. Ive got them all written down on some folded up paper on my desk. I check their onlins status every day. Abigail Zemeckis hasnt been online yet this week but I made a note that she was giving birth so she might miss a day or two.
  7. ANet announced GW2 in 2007, five years before it was launched in 2012, and it did affect the current game at that time.
  8. Exactly. Any game released now is competing with existing titles with a decade or two of content, tons of QoL additions, and so on. Sure the new game might have a gimmick, or a few of them, to separate it from the more mature games but it will need to compete on a feature to feature basis to attract a mass player base for any length of time.
  9. This hasn't affected me so far but I can see how it could (and does) affect others...so, yeah an option like this would be cool.
  10. Dang it, those notes had my hopes up. I was all set to go buy a few thousand gems to show my appreciation for the new direction of the game!
  11. Yeah, that is why I included that part. I have no idea what the rules are there.
  12. Knowingly providing false information regarding your business prospects to investors is illegal in the US.
  13. I must admit that the item is much more tempting now. Once Ive worked my way through the several stacks of the consumables I have on hand I might consider it.
  14. This encompasses my preference as well. Some tweaks rather than a massive changes would hit the mark for me.
  15. Elementalist feels like a mage to me, or would if staff were a better weapon. The idea that a mage needs to attack at melee range, with melee weapons, to reach its potential as a "nuker" is a bit off IMO. Again, all it would take is a rework for staff for me to be happy with Ele. And I agree with the comment above about not caring for the target cap of five, especially for Meteor Shower.
  16. I am projecting nothing. I do tend to look with suspicion on claims of having quit the game by people who continue to frequent the forums. I left previously because I was disgusted with ANet, and did not "wander" around the forums talking about how much I was NOT playing the game. When I leave again, quite possibly very soon, because I am again disgusted with ANet, I will be gone until such time as a friend (many of my guildmates are people I know in real life) lures me back or something of the sort. As it stands now I would hardly say that I currently "love" the game as I am primarily playing because people I wish to spend gaming time with are doing so....but even that draw is finite.
  17. Yeah, they definitely need to stop printing their scripts on the back of originals of the magna carta.
  18. Claim to have quit the game. Personally I have "left" for extended breaks a few times and still remain.
  19. I never claimed to not be interested. That said, I just noticed your statement, in another thread, that you are using google to translate to/from English. Perhaps you didnt intend to say what I paraphrased here but my statement was an accurate representation of how google translated your intended statement. I apologize for picking apart a comment based on what was said in a situation where the fault lies with a language barrier. I do not normally respond as I did here when I am aware of the nature of the issue.
×
×
  • Create New...