kratan.4619

If you want to duo queue then you should only fight other duo queue, the only people ever to argue against this are people who do duo queue for the sole reason of owning two random queue people because of their class synergy/communication advantage. These are the people who are not looking for close fights or any form of competition and just want to squash non-duos with impunity.

C'mon all, we don't want this thread to turn into a witch pursuit thing.

I am pretty much only there for rewards, AP, backpack, etc. But, if you are in the same level of ranking I am, floats around in silver, you are not very good anyway.

From posts on the forums it appears that people have been waiting for that for 7+ years

Maybe they are keeping the penguins with the horses.

I love it when I find a runner, I just wave as they leave and continue with objectives, they really don't add much to their team.

Because it fills my title list more, I don't even display a title in game, it is all personal accomplishments. And I am not the one asking for a hardcore mode, only offering another option for someone who does want it.

All I have read here is the fact that someone does not like downstate and will not adapt their own play style to take into account that the fight is not over until you finish it, getting someone into the downstate does not mean you won.

Can I stand in LA and use tomes to get the levels? I wouldn't even care, I only need to know that I did it without tomes. What other people think about how I earned my title doesn't matter to me.

The game is not, and should not, be balanced for 2v2. People will of course play the best combination of classes to get the most advantage, this is what most people tend to call min-maxing only in this case they are min-maxing two classes at once. There is nothing wrong with this just because it makes it unpleasant for those who are not doing this.

Never seen a hoard drop yet, honestly, I do not kill it everyday, but have accomplished the feat a few times over 7 years.

They could add some titles, like GW1, about not dying for x number of levels. This would still give a form of reward for accomplishing the task and give a "hardcore" type of gameplay if you wanted to go for that title. That may appease a greater audience, without having to create new game play rules.

You could just level up to 80 killing the bandits trying to poison the water in Queensdale I guess.

Don't you dare try to introduce consequences for your actions in a game. Everyone should be able to do whatever they want with no consequences.

Because I can play when I want and what I want at anytime without having the "fear" of falling behind gear-wise. When I am playing it is pretty much an AP hunt for me, this gives me diverse play and I am not locked into one game mode to gain, I can play any of them.

AP, must be 13 chars

I think you misunderstood my point.There is currently a rank 20 required to queue ranked games.Lowering the rank required to queue ranked games to 10 would allow faster accessibility to ranked games while at the same time preserving the current state of match manipulation level.It will not impact match manipulation.It will only impact the faster accessibility to ranked games with no drawbacks because bots are already present. But you have already stated. "It's not hard to reach rank 20 don't get me wrong", so how much faster does it need to be?

It sounds like the title should have been "Why is thief dagger/dagger not the best weapon option?"

Lack of way points in the new zones is a direct result of having mounts added to the game. The older zones never needed mounts because of so many way points, but people cried that they needed mounts so they added them anyway.

A new race would probably be an expansion on its own. Will there need to be new racial low-level zones, 1 - 15, 15 - 25, etc? Armor re-design for the new race. Personal story line. It is not as simple as saying, "Here's a new race skin have fun!"

All these polls are missing options, not every answer is black or white ,needed to include "I don't care about rating".

Agree with this, people who do not want to "get friends" do not get punished by having to pug against full organized groups.

Excellent argument! Don't hit your ego on the door frame on your way out. Yes, because "It's too noob-proof" is a much better argument and with no solutions, other than "NERF" , for whatever you personally think needs nerfing.

Need them dead for the achievement, until that is done I will continue killing them.

At least you have the option to do just that.