Loosmaster.8263 Posted May 12, 2019 Share Posted May 12, 2019 Pointless. They already have EotM map they can go to. And since when is a 20 man group considered roamers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celsith.2753 Posted May 12, 2019 Share Posted May 12, 2019 @Gop.8713 said:assists players in choosing their interactions.assists players in choosing their interactions.assists players in choosing their interactions.Thankyou for taking several sentences to basically say exactly what I did. You don't need to add the hyperbole, simply say that you prefer it if that is your choice :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stand The Wall.6987 Posted May 12, 2019 Author Share Posted May 12, 2019 @Tiawal.2351 said:Of course this would have been great (when WvW was still alive, now doesn't matter anymore), even more, all our maps should have been limited to a maximum of 30-40 players per side instead the ~60-80 we have now: just double number of maps, like 5 EB maps, 1 Desert, 2 Alpine for regular WvWand one map with 3x size of Obsidian Sanctum Arena for 20vs20vs20 (just blank, empty, flat map, 0 dev time spent) just for fights, and allow switching sides too for when one side can't field 20maybe in Guild Wars 4, where won't be PvE anymore, just WvW forever and ever@Loosmaster.8263 said:Pointless. They already have EotM map they can go to. And since when is a 20 man group considered roamers?your posts made me edit the OP based on a convo I had with other people in this thread. with that info, regardless of whether you agree with it or not, do you think something like that could work? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
primatos.5413 Posted May 12, 2019 Share Posted May 12, 2019 @LetoII.3782 said:I'd love to see DBLs old center event come back as a stand-aloneIf it would have been scaling somehow with the ppt score it might have been usefull in a way .. but this event thing failed by far not only by the horrible lags which it caused ^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGrimm.5624 Posted May 12, 2019 Share Posted May 12, 2019 No. We need collision. Want to run in a zerg ball, ok but be ready to bounce off people. Don't care how it impacts latency, that's up to the programmers and servers to handle. Run with more you had better move well together else pay the price for having so many in one small spot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stand The Wall.6987 Posted May 13, 2019 Author Share Posted May 13, 2019 @TheGrimm.5624 said:No. We need collision. Want to run in a zerg ball, ok but be ready to bounce off people. Don't care how it impacts latency, that's up to the programmers and servers to handle. Run with more you had better move well together else pay the price for having so many in one small spot. only if a boing sound procs when you run into someone, and if youre an asura who gets squished in the middle of the zerg you get launched 1000ft into the air. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanAlcedo.3281 Posted May 13, 2019 Share Posted May 13, 2019 Why would roamers go to a map without zerglings.Killing zerglings is their job.If they want to fight other roamers, then they can play PvP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gop.8713 Posted May 13, 2019 Share Posted May 13, 2019 @Celsith.2753 said:@Gop.8713 said:assists players in choosing their interactions.assists players in choosing their interactions.assists players in choosing their interactions.Thankyou for taking several sentences to basically say exactly what I did. You don't need to add the hyperbole, simply say that you prefer it if that is your choice :)That is my mistake then and I apologize. I misunderstood your post to say that you felt the mount decreased player interaction while I was pointing out that player interaction was actually increased by access to the mount. I did not realize that was what you were saying as well. Perhaps if you had used more sentences your meaning would have been more clear :)Also it was more sarcasm than hyperbole which I tried to indicate both with :p and by starting my actual response with 'for a more serious response'. It was meant in jest but if you chose to take offense then again I apologize . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryudnard.2587 Posted May 13, 2019 Share Posted May 13, 2019 20vs20vs20 pvp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGrimm.5624 Posted May 13, 2019 Share Posted May 13, 2019 @Stand The Wall.6987 said:@TheGrimm.5624 said:No. We need collision. Want to run in a zerg ball, ok but be ready to bounce off people. Don't care how it impacts latency, that's up to the programmers and servers to handle. Run with more you had better move well together else pay the price for having so many in one small spot. only if a boing sound procs when you run into someone, and if youre an asura who gets squished in the middle of the zerg you get launched 1000ft into the air.These are not mutually exclusive, sold! :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.