Jump to content
  • Sign Up

kharmin.7683

Members
  • Posts

    10,148
  • Joined

Everything posted by kharmin.7683

  1. I think this was the point with Anet's implementation of fishing. I don't believe that they wanted it to be a chilled out type of thing. I think that, as designed, it's intended to be a more active game-play as it encourages fishing with others and also the occasional things that attack or otherwise disrupt it. /shrug
  2. That would be against the forums CoC (which I suggest you read): Creating Duplicate Threads / Cross posting repeat an existing topic in the same forum or a different subforum; please use the “Search” feature repost a thread about the same topic after a thread is locked
  3. GW2 isn't configured for professions to have specific roles. I'm not sure how it could be programmed to know when a particular build satisfies a particular definition/interpretation of a specific role.
  4. How about keeping a few of these on hand for such an "emergency"?
  5. I don't see the point. There wouldn't be enough money to be made to justify the expense of doing this. Besides, the GW1 servers are still running, so if you need to placate your nostalgia, you can already do so.
  6. Ruby is probably not on the Anet legal team, so she probably wouldn't be able to answer this for you. Maybe submit a ticket to Support and they can pass it along to the relevant people.
  7. While interesting perhaps, I don't see that there is enough of a demand for this type of format to justify the investment of resources that would probably be needed. It also seems to me to stray away from GW2's original intent as an MMO.
  8. I believe that raids were a mistake.
  9. Isn't this what the embiggering tonic is for? 😁
  10. OP if you really want clarification on the macro policy, then you will need to have a discussion with Anet. No one here can give you an official answer unless they are marked as an Anet employee.
  11. I would prefer resources be spent elsewhere. I don't think that fishing should have ever been implemented in the first place. Just my opinion. /shrug
  12. All of which can be obtained by playing the game and using in-game currencies. No need to "pay" and there is really nothing to "win".
  13. Perhaps they meant that most GW2 players don't play PvP? Evidence would be the amount of resources that the studio uses on that format? No. No, it isn't P2W. Nothing you can buy can help you "win" GW2.
  14. Heavens no to all of that in OWPvE.
  15. Ok, but then what? What does Anet release after that?
  16. An expansion like this would be of even less interest for many players who didn't even enjoy the latest one if they had no interest in legendary items. This idea would seem to be even less content, which I don't see Anet implementing as an expansion. /shrug
  17. What does installing GW2 have to do with this argument? Once the game is installed, there are many things in the game that show more information when they are hovered over with the mouse pointer.
  18. More long hair for women, please.
  19. Sounds like a "people are winning faster than I am, so I want to make changes to ensure that I can win" type of complaint. 🙄
  20. This has been requested several times. You can use the forums search feature to read those threads.
  21. Plenty of threads exist as to why they can't do this.
  22. I think that we knew this after MH sword was changed? At least, I had the impression that things were shifting to power. I guess the devs think that ranger players only want to play for DPS now.
  23. I use Steam as my launcher (GW2 as a third-party game, not as a Steam purchase/download) and there is an option to overlay FPS
×
×
  • Create New...