Zephyra.4709 Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 Agreed with Zeghart.9841Gameplay would be too fast and chaotic; imagine trying to break into enemy garri. One defender scouts you and calls their entire zerg over. Lucky for you your side is competent enough to eliminate them but unfortunately with having mounts accessible those enemies you just defeated would be zipping straight back into that garri relatively swiftly to defend and evermore spew AC fire or eventually overwhelm your forces. Sounds fun on paper but in reality it's just more mess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ather.7452 Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 Only raptors on desert borderlands Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blood Red Arachnid.2493 Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 I don't think mounts should be in WvW. This is largely because overworld mobility is an important factor for different classes in the game. And also, a lack of in-border mobility is the only thing that makes taking towers and camps possible in many situations.Travel time means a lot in WvW. And while it sucks to have to run back to Stonemist every time it gets attacked, that time taken is an important balancing factor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
momophily.3814 Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 The current maps are too small, mounts would mean WvW bumper cars more than anything else. I would appreciate mounts on a map the size of say Elon Riverlands or The Desolation. Give us a new map that size, and I'd be all for mounts on that WvW map Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artaz.3819 Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 It's not a matter of if but when ... ANet needs the WvW player base to pay for the gem store skins (or special saddles/flare on mounts too).Restricting mounts to owned areas is not good. It gives a huge defensive advantage.Restricting mounts to ground based as a start. Removing any form of perma-evasion/AoE attacks, etc. from PvE.Severely reduce pet health (to 1 HP) or any CC to dismount. The purpose of mounts should not be for charging into zergs while stealthed or it will favor the larger zerg over and over again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoltreez.6435 Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 deleted it :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnuzone.8395 Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 There's so much other things to improve in WvW that mounts isn't even on my top 50 list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigpapasmurf.5623 Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 Im up front saying no as it can be abused as it, even restricting to own territories only. Yes it would make responding faster, however with being able to glide, imo, responding has already gotten faster. I understand that it gives the defenders a chance, however adding mounts to make it even faster would reduce the attackers chances even slimmer.Gotta look at it from both side's perspective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krystal.5429 Posted October 5, 2017 Share Posted October 5, 2017 Give WvW mounts plz... Players said gliding would suck in WvW but look how much fun they are! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riku.4821 Posted October 6, 2017 Share Posted October 6, 2017 So I voted no; my reasons why are as followed.It would break up the zergs or parties too much if someone didn't have PoF.The bunny jump would break the game mode, because you can just hop over every wall and kill the npcs?Other than that, I'd like to see the raptor skimmer, but thats about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.